Which sociological theory do you find to be the most accurate (Functionalism, Conflict, Symbolic Interactionism)? Why? Explain. | Online Homework Aiders

I’m studying for my Sociology class and don’t understand how to answer this. Can you help me study?

Don't use plagiarized sources. Get Your Custom Essay on
Which sociological theory do you find to be the most accurate (Functionalism, Conflict, Symbolic Interactionism)? Why? Explain. | Online Homework Aiders
Get an essay WRITTEN FOR YOU, Plagiarism free, and by an EXPERT! Just from $10/Page
Order Essay

Which sociological theory do you find to be the most accurate (Functionalism, Conflict, Symbolic Interactionism)? Why? Explain.( 2 paragraphs must)

Also respond to 3 other students. whether you agree or disagree with them and why? (2 sentences per respond )

student 1:Out of the 3 sociological theories, the one I find to be the most accurate as well as relatable is “Conflict Theory.

We learned that Conflict Theory sees society when there is a type of inequality or power disbalance and then how this may produce reactions of “struggle or competitiveness or conflict.” Conflict theory seems to be the accurate one since the hierarchy is formed, there always seems to be a huge gap, which creates conflict and tension. And as each hierarchy and division is created, we see movements happening. Look at our world today! I can not find a better theory that fits today’s news. In my understanding, the reason I see the other 2 sociological theories to be less accurate than Conflict Theory is because of the irregularities brought by the theory itself. Functionalism Theory seems to have a lot of potholes. Functionalism depends on every individual playing their part. But what if one person doesn’t do their part? What if there is dysfunction is this “system”? We see not much of a drastic impact, therefore weakening the theory itself. Whereas Symbolic Interactionism also seems to have some irregularities, like not taking the person’s intentions/thought process after analyzing a symbol. Everyone is different and how to interpret something can be different. What they do after they interpret could move away from what the theory says.

I understand that it definitely depends on one’s perspective too. I may be wearing and seeing only through the lens of Conflict Theory, while some may be analyzing today’s society with another theory. All I know is when I switch on my television, watch the news, and see today’s society and the norms created around it – I clearly see how “Conflict Theory” would be matched to many headlines today.

Student 2:After reading about the three theories the one I believe to be the most accurate would be the Functionalism theory. I believe each “function” plays its role and does make a stable environment. I believe the social institutes such as the government, education, the law, religion ect. all provided order and shared public values and each function shares several roles in society and this is what makes the world go round. All of the social facts that are mentioned play a huge part and many of our everyday lives and has worked for many years. With out some sort of structure society would be unorganized and caotic. These functions exist because they play a vital role in the functioning society and if these roles die new institution’s will evolve and or emerge.

Student 3:After comparing these three sociological theories, I find that symbolic interactionism is more accurate.

Symbolic interactionism focuses on our day-to-day social interactions vs other theories that look on other issues that can be debatable. We can definitely glean more from looking at what people do in there natural environment and learn why they do it and how that affects their social interactions than looking at conflict which can vary or be subjective — depending what is considered to be a conflict in different cultures.

Learning about how we think, what we become, and how we imagine ourselves creates a more insightful explanation when it is based on day-to-day activities that are relate-able and understandable. With symbolic interactionism there is less interpretation and more substantial and accurate information to explain social interaction in any given culture or society.

Place your order
(550 words)

Approximate price: $22

Calculate the price of your order

550 words
We'll send you the first draft for approval by September 11, 2018 at 10:52 AM
Total price:
$26
The price is based on these factors:
Academic level
Number of pages
Urgency
Basic features
  • Free title page and bibliography
  • Unlimited revisions
  • Plagiarism-free guarantee
  • Money-back guarantee
  • 24/7 support
On-demand options
  • Writer’s samples
  • Part-by-part delivery
  • Overnight delivery
  • Copies of used sources
  • Expert Proofreading
Paper format
  • 275 words per page
  • 12 pt Arial/Times New Roman
  • Double line spacing
  • Any citation style (APA, MLA, Chicago/Turabian, Harvard)

Our guarantees

Delivering a high-quality product at a reasonable price is not enough anymore.
That’s why we have developed 5 beneficial guarantees that will make your experience with our service enjoyable, easy, and safe.

Money-back guarantee

You have to be 100% sure of the quality of your product to give a money-back guarantee. This describes us perfectly. Make sure that this guarantee is totally transparent.

Zero-plagiarism guarantee

Each paper is composed from scratch, according to your instructions. It is then checked by our plagiarism-detection software. There is no gap where plagiarism could squeeze in.

Free-revision policy

Thanks to our free revisions, there is no way for you to be unsatisfied. We will work on your paper until you are completely happy with the result.

Privacy policy

Your email is safe, as we store it according to international data protection rules. Your bank details are secure, as we use only reliable payment systems.

Fair-cooperation guarantee

By sending us your money, you buy the service we provide. Check out our terms and conditions if you prefer business talks to be laid out in official language.