I need an explanation for this Philosophy question to help me study.
Watch and listen to a talk at Google by Australian philosopher Peter Godfrey-Smith:
Question for you to reflect on: why would Google spend money on a talk about animal minds?
2. Identify some claims by Godfrey-Smith that Nagel would *agree* with, and some claims that Nagel would *disagree* with.
What are some differences in their respective ways of philosophizing that would explain these disagreements?
This will be a short paragraph of a complete/incomplete fashion.
Please make it easy and do not use any complicated sentences or words
Delivering a high-quality product at a reasonable price is not enough anymore.
That’s why we have developed 5 beneficial guarantees that will make your experience with our service enjoyable, easy, and safe.
You have to be 100% sure of the quality of your product to give a money-back guarantee. This describes us perfectly. Make sure that this guarantee is totally transparent.
Each paper is composed from scratch, according to your instructions. It is then checked by our plagiarism-detection software. There is no gap where plagiarism could squeeze in.
Thanks to our free revisions, there is no way for you to be unsatisfied. We will work on your paper until you are completely happy with the result.
Your email is safe, as we store it according to international data protection rules. Your bank details are secure, as we use only reliable payment systems.