Pennypacker & Vandelay LLC Report of The Independent Auditors Case Study My course is Finance for Health administration – Master of Health administration

Pennypacker & Vandelay LLC Report of The Independent Auditors Case Study My course is Finance for Health administration – Master of Health administration

Financial Management of Healthcare Organizations

Final Examination

Activity: Your accounting firm, Pennypacker & Vandelay, LLC, has been asked by the Chairman of Harris Memorial Hospital and Harris Community Foundation to attend the annual board meeting to present the report of the Independent Auditors. The purpose of the presentation is to give the Board the financial highlights of the annual financial statements and advise them of any unusual events both current and in the foreseeable future that might impact the overall financial statements. The managing partner of the firm has asked you as a Director in the Health Advisory Department to make the presentation to the board.

Question: Develop a board of Director’s financial presentation (power point-10 slide limit) based on the Case Example, displayed in our text in Appendix Chapter 9-A, for Harris Memorial Hospital and Harris Community Foundation’s Audited Financial Statements and Footnotes. In preparing your comments and analysis, be sure to address the type of opinion rendered included in the report of the Independent Auditor (Pennypacker & Vandelay, LLC) and use the format in Chapter 13, (Table13-7) and (Figure13-4) to display your analysis and explanation for the comparative years December 31, 20X7 and 20X6. Based on your analysis explain the variances and what actions can be taken by management to improve the financial presentation for the next calendar year 20X8. Also, consider in your presentation any pending legislation activity (Sequestration, ACA or HITECH provision relating to HIPAA, or Community Benefit Analysis required by PPACA through the completion of Form 990) that you think might be helpful to the board in understanding the current environment.

Rubric

Final Examination Rubric

Final Examination Rubric

Criteria Ratings Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeType of Opinion Rendered

20.0 pts

Full Marks

20.0 pts

Proficient

Correct response to the opinion by the auditors.

15.0 pts

Competent

Incorrect response to the type of opinion rendered by the auditor

10.0 pts

Novice

Incorrect response to the type of opinion rendered by the auditors but response is supported with a rebuttal.

0.0 pts

Incomplete

No response to type of opinion rendered.

0.0 pts

No Marks

20.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeRatio Analysis and Return on Equity calculation for comparative years.

30.0 pts

Full Marks

30.0 pts

Proficient

All ratios completed and correct for five categories of ratios. Return on equity calculation for comparative periods complete and correct.

25.0 pts

Competent

All ratios complete and correct for three out of five categories. Return on equity calculation for comparative periods complete and correct for one period.

20.0 pts

Novice

All ratios complete and correct for two out of five categories. Return on equity calculation for comparative periods complete and incorrect for both periods.

0.0 pts

Incomplete

No response to the calculations or less than two correct.

0.0 pts

No Marks

30.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAnalysis and Explanation of variances for comparative years

30.0 pts

Full Marks

30.0 pts

Proficient

Analysis and explanation of variances for comparative years completed for all five categories of ratios.

25.0 pts

Competent

Analysis and explanation of variances for comparative years complete for three out of five categories.

15.0 pts

Novice

Analysis and explanation of variances for comparative years complete for two out of the five categories.

0.0 pts

Incomplete

No response to analysis and explanation or less than two correct.

0.0 pts

No Marks

30.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeConventions

10.0 pts

Full Marks

9.0 pts

Proficient

Post have no grammatical or spelling errors. APA format is used when appropriate with no errors.

5.0 pts

Competent

Post have few grammatical and spelling errors. APA format is used when appropriate or is used with more than four errors.

0.0 pts

Incomplete

Post have numerous grammatical or spelling errors. APA format is not utilized.

0.0 pts

No Marks

0.0 pts

Novice

Post have many grammatical and or spelling errors. APA format is not used when appropriate or is used with more than four errors.

10.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeRecommendations/Future Events

10.0 pts

Full Marks

9.0 pts

Proficient

Five recommendations and 5 future events identified and reported at the board meeting

5.0 pts

Competent

Four recommendations and four future events identified and reported at the board meeting.

3.0 pts

n

Three recommendations and three future events identified and reported at the board meeting.

0.0 pts

Incomplete

No responses to recommendations and future events or less than three identified.

0.0 pts

No Marks

10.0 pts

Total Points: 100.0 Scanned by CamScanner
Scanned by CamScanner
Scanned by CamScanner
Scanned by CamScanner
Scanned by CamScanner
Scanned by CamScanner
Scanned by CamScanner
Scanned by CamScanner
Scanned by CamScanner
Scanned by CamScanner
Scanned by CamScanner
Scanned by CamScanner
Scanned by CamScanner
Scanned by CamScanner
Scanned by CamScanner
Scanned by CamScanner
Scanned by CamScanner
Scanned by CamScanner
Scanned by CamScanner
Scanned by CamScanner
Scanned by CamScanner
Scanned by CamScanner
Scanned by CamScanner
Scanned by CamScanner
Scanned by CamScanner
Scanned by CamScanner

Purchase answer to see full
attachment