NR 505 Chamberlain Chlorhexidine for Meatal Cleaning in Reducing Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections Discussion Week 3
With new information continually emerging, professional nurses must be equipped to critique scholarly literature and discern its value for practice. Select one current, quantitative scholarly nursing article related to your PICOT question and determine its strengths, limitations, and potential application.
PICOT Question written in full: In hospitalized patients with urinary catheters, will daily in comparison to every other day catheter care with chlorhexidine prevent catheter-associated urinary tract infections within 30 days?
Complete the Johns Hopkins Nursing Evidence Based Practice Appendix E Evidence Appraisal Tool. Once youve completed the tool, use your own words to summarize your appraisal of the article. Include the following:
Description of the purpose
Explanation of research design
Discussion of sample
Description of data collection methods
Summary of findings
Strengths of the study (minimum of 1)
Limitations of the study (minimum of 1)
Recommendations regarding potential application for future practice that are insightful and appropriate.
Attach the article to your post, in addition to including the full reference for the article in your post.
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeQuality of Initial Posting
Addresses the collaboration café question in a thorough, substantive manner.
Demonstrates application of course concepts.
Discusses implications for advanced nursing practice.
20.0 pts
Excellent
Fully meets all requirements
18.0 pts
Very Good
Most requirements fully met, but one requirement is superficial
17.0 pts
Satisfactory
All elements are addressed, but two items are covered in a superficial or limited manner
10.0 pts
Needs Improvement
All elements are addressed, but all are covered in a superficial or limited manner OR missing one element
0.0 pts
Unsatisfactory
No response post to another student.
20.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeQuality of Responsive Postings
Responds to 2 separate classmates with substantive dialogue that is collaborative in nature.
Each of the 2 postings asks questions, offers new insights, applications, perspectives, information, or implications for practice
20.0 pts
Excellent
Fully meets all requirements
18.0 pts
Very Good
Most requirements fully met, but one requirement is superficial
17.0 pts
Satisfactory
All elements are addressed, but two items are covered in a superficial or limited manner
10.0 pts
Needs Improvement
All elements are addressed, but all are covered in a superficial or limited manner OR missing one element
0.0 pts
Unsatisfactory
Does not address the initial question(s) OR missing more than one element
20.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeGraduate Writing
Postings reflect clarity, organization, and logical flow of ideas.
Postings convey a tone of professionalism and respect.
Correct spelling, grammar, punctuation, syntax, sentence, and paragraph structure is evident.
When sources are included, correct APA format for citation and referencing is applied.
No direct quotes are used in this assignment
10.0 pts
Excellent
No errors present
9.0 pts
Very Good
1-2 errors present
8.0 pts
Satisfactory
3-4 errors present
5.0 pts
Needs Improvement
5-6 errors present
0.0 pts
Unsatisfactory
7 or more errors present
10.0 pts Week 3
With new information continually emerging, professional nurses must be equipped to
critique scholarly literature and discern its value for practice. Select one current,
quantitative scholarly nursing article related to your PICOT question and
determine its strengths, limitations, and potential application.
PICOT Question written in full: In hospitalized patients with
urinary catheters, will daily in comparison to every other day catheter
care with chlorhexidine prevent catheter-associated urinary tract
infections within 30 days?
o
Complete the Johns Hopkins Nursing Evidence Based Practice Appendix E Evidence
Appraisal Tool . Once youve completed the tool, use your own words to summarize
your appraisal of the article. Include the following:
Description of the purpose
Explanation of research design
Discussion of sample
Description of data collection methods
Summary of findings
Strengths of the study (minimum of 1)
Limitations of the study (minimum of 1)
Recommendations regarding potential application for future practice that are insightful
and appropriate.
Attach the article to your post, in addition to including the full reference for the article in
your post.
This criterion is
linked to a
Learning
OutcomeQuality
of Initial Posting
Addresses the
collaboration café
question in a
thorough,
substantive
manner.
Demonstrates
application of
course concepts.
Discusses
implications for
advanced nursing
practice.
This criterion is
linked to a
Learning
OutcomeQuality
of Responsive
Postings
Responds to 2
separate
classmates with
substantive
dialogue that is
collaborative in
nature.
Each of the 2
postings asks
questions, offers
new insights,
applications,
perspectives,
information, or
implications for
practice
20.0 pts
Excellent
Fully meets
all
requirements
18.0 pts
Very Good
Most
requirements
fully met, but
one
requirement is
superficial
17.0 pts
Satisfactory
All elements
are addressed,
but two items
are covered in
a superficial or
limited manner
20.0 pts
Excellent
Fully meets
all
requirements
18.0 pts
Very Good
Most
requirements
fully met, but
one
requirement is
superficial
17.0 pts
Satisfactory
All elements
are addressed,
but two items
are covered in
a superficial or
limited manner
10.0 pts
Needs
Improvement
All elements are
addressed, but all
are covered in a
superficial or
limited manner
OR missing one
element
10.0 pts
Needs
Improvement
All elements are
addressed, but all
are covered in a
superficial or
limited manner
OR missing one
element
0.0 pts
Unsatisfactory
No response
post to another
student.
0.0 pts
Unsatisfactory
Does not address
the initial
question(s) OR
missing more
than one element
20.0
20.0
This criterion is
linked to a
Learning
OutcomeGraduate
Writing
Postings reflect
clarity,
organization, and
logical flow of
ideas.
Postings convey
a tone of
professionalism
and respect.
Correct spelling,
grammar,
punctuation,
syntax, sentence,
and paragraph
structure is
evident.
When sources
are included,
correct APA
format for citation
and referencing is
applied.
No direct quotes
are used in this
assignment
10.0 pts
Excellent
No errors
present
9.0 pts
Very Good
1-2 errors
present
8.0 pts
Satisfactory
3-4 errors
present
5.0 pts
Needs
Improvement
5-6 errors present
0.0 pts
Unsatisfactory
7 or more errors
present
10.0
Purchase answer to see full
attachment
Delivering a high-quality product at a reasonable price is not enough anymore.
That’s why we have developed 5 beneficial guarantees that will make your experience with our service enjoyable, easy, and safe.
You have to be 100% sure of the quality of your product to give a money-back guarantee. This describes us perfectly. Make sure that this guarantee is totally transparent.
Each paper is composed from scratch, according to your instructions. It is then checked by our plagiarism-detection software. There is no gap where plagiarism could squeeze in.
Thanks to our free revisions, there is no way for you to be unsatisfied. We will work on your paper until you are completely happy with the result.
