HU 240 Herzing University Week 3 Compare and Contrast Religions Paper Unit 3 Assessment – Compare and Contrast Religions
Submit Assignment
Due Sunday by 10:59pm
Points 85
Submitting a text entry box or a file upload
Instructions
Contrast: Religions
EVALUATION TITLE: COMPARE AND CONTRAST RELIGIONS
At the end of unit 3, use the attached Comparison Chart to compile a table that compares and contrasts the foundational concepts and tenets of:
Hinduism
Judaism
Christianity
Islam
Atheism
Buddhism
Include in the comparison:
the relationship to God(s)
relationship to people
primary scriptures
primary rules of conduct
at least 4 primary beliefs
Using the analysis that you did for the comparison table, explain what you think about each of the different categories of religions.
How does the diversity of religious beliefs benefit all mankind on the planet?
How do people use the diversity of religious beliefs to cause conflicts between groups of people?
Why do you think that so many people ignore the similarities between the different religions and only focus on the ways that they are divided?
Please be sure to validate your opinions and ideas with citations and references in APA format.
Estimated time to complete: 4 hours
Assignment File:
HU240 Unit 3 Assignment Comparison Chart [Word Document]
Rubric
HU240 Unit 3 Assessment – Compare and Contrast Religions
HU240 Unit 3 Assessment – Compare and Contrast Religions
Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent
27.0 pts
Level 5
Expresses content knowledge with the assignment purpose in a complete, organized, clear, professional, and culturally respectful manner.
24.0 pts
Level 4
Expresses content knowledge with the assignment purpose in a complete, organized, clear, professional, and culturally respectful manner with minor weaknesses in one or more of the areas.
22.0 pts
Level 3
Partially expresses content knowledge with the assignment purpose. Expresses ideas in a complete, organized, clear, professional, and culturally respectful manner with weaknesses in these area.
19.0 pts
Level 2
Partially expresses content knowledge with the assignment purpose. Ideas are partially expressed in an organized, professional, and culturally respectful manner with major weaknesses in these areas.
16.0 pts
Level 1
Expresses limited content knowledge with the assignment purpose. Ideas are not expressed in a complete, organized, clear, professional, and/or culturally respectful manner.
0.0 pts
Level 0
The assignment was not completed or there are no constructed concepts that demonstrate analytically skills and no evidences to support the content does not align to the assignment instructions
27.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAnalysis
27.0 pts
Level 5
Constructs concepts related to course content, demonstrating strong analytical skills with strong evidence to support professional and personal subject knowledge through details, supporting evidence, and idea differentiation.
24.0 pts
Level 4
Constructs concepts related to course content, demonstrating strong analytical skills with evidence to support professional and personal subject knowledge through details, supporting evidence, and idea differentiation.
22.0 pts
Level 3
Constructs concepts related to course content, demonstrating analytical skills with some evidence to support professional and personal subject knowledge through details, supporting evidence, and idea differentiation.
19.0 pts
Level 2
Constructs concepts related to course content, demonstrating weak analytical skills with minimal evidence to support professional and personal subject knowledge through details, supporting evidence, and idea differentiation.
16.0 pts
Level 1
Constructs concepts related to course content, demonstrating inadequate evidence of analytical skills. There is minimal or no evidence to support professional and personal subject knowledge through details, supporting evidence, and idea differentiation.
0.0 pts
Level 0
The assignment was not completed or there was no evidence of constructed concepts that are supported by professional and personal subject knowledge through details, supporting evidence, and idea differentiation.
27.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeTechnology
15.0 pts
Level 5
Manipulates multiple technological resources to effectively implement all assignment requirements.
14.0 pts
Level 4
Manipulates multiple technological resources to effectively implement most assignment requirements.
12.0 pts
Level 3
Manipulates multiple technological resources to effectively implement some assignment requirements.
11.0 pts
Level 2
Manipulates multiple technological resources for some assignment requirements.
9.0 pts
Level 1
Manipulates technological resources to minimally meet some assignment requirements.
0.0 pts
Level 0
The assignment was not completed or difficulties with technological manipulation were evident. The assignment submitted does not meet requriements.
15.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWriting
10.0 pts
Level 5
The assignment exhibits a excellent command of written English language conventions. The assignment has no errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling.
6.0 pts
Level 4
The assignment exhibits a good command of written English language conventions. The assignment has no errors in mechanics, or spelling with minor grammatical errors that impair the flow of communication.
4.0 pts
Level 3
The assignment exhibits a basic command of written English language conventions. The assignment has minor errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that impact the flow of communication
2.0 pts
Level 2
The assignment exhibits a limited command of written English language conventions. The assignment has frequent errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that impede the flow of communication.
1.0 pts
Level 1
The assignment exhibits little command of written English language conventions. The assignment has errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that cause the reader to stop and reread parts of the writing to discern meaning.
0.0 pts
Level 0
The assignment does not demonstrate command of written English language conventions. The assignment has multiple errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that cause the reader difficulty discerning the meaning.
10.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAPA
6.0 pts
Level 5
In-text citations of sources and references in proper APA style are included with no errors.
5.0 pts
Level 4
In-text citations of sources and references in proper APA style are included but have 1-2 minor APA errors.
4.0 pts
Level 3
In-text citations of sources and references in proper APA style are included but have 3 – 4 minor APA errors.
3.0 pts
Level 2
In-text citations of sources and references in proper APA style are included but have more than 4 errors.
2.0 pts
Level 1
The errors demonstrate limited understanding of in-text citation and reference requirements
0.0 pts
Level 0
There are no in-text citations AND/OR references.
6.0 pts
Total Points: 85.0
Delivering a high-quality product at a reasonable price is not enough anymore.
That’s why we have developed 5 beneficial guarantees that will make your experience with our service enjoyable, easy, and safe.
You have to be 100% sure of the quality of your product to give a money-back guarantee. This describes us perfectly. Make sure that this guarantee is totally transparent.
Each paper is composed from scratch, according to your instructions. It is then checked by our plagiarism-detection software. There is no gap where plagiarism could squeeze in.
Thanks to our free revisions, there is no way for you to be unsatisfied. We will work on your paper until you are completely happy with the result.
