Business Intelligence Questions Discussion Text book attached. APA format and minimum 2 professional refernces.Q.1 What is the relationship between Naïve B

Business Intelligence Questions Discussion Text book attached. APA format and minimum 2 professional refernces.Q.1 What is the relationship between Naïve Bayes and Bayesian networks? What is the process of developing a Bayesian networks model? Chapter 5 – 250-300 wordsQ.2 List and briefly describe the nine-step process in con-ducting a neural network project? Chapter 6 – 250-300 words. Ch 31 EOC Writing Assignment
Immar Medrano was employed as a journeyman electrician by
Marshall Electrical Contracting, Inc. (MEC), in Marshall, Missouri.
Medrano attended an electrician apprenticeship night class at a
community college in Sedalia, Missouri. MEC paid Medrano’s
tuition and book fees. Attendance at the course required Medrano
to drive 70 miles roundtrip. One night, when Medrano was driving
home from the class, a drunk driver crossed the centerline of U.S.
Highway 65 and collided head-on with Medrano’s automobile.
Medrano died in the accident. His wife and two children filed a
workers’ compensation claim for death benefits against MEC. Are
Medrano’s actions at the time of the automobile accident within
the course and scope of his employment, thus entitling his heirs to
workers’ compensation benefits? Medrano v. Marshall Electrical
Contracting Inc., 173 S.W.3d 333, 2005 Mo. App. Lexis 1088
(Court of Appeals of Missouri, 2005)
Written work must follow this format:
• Must be in Legal Memo Format;
• Times Roman 12 point font;
• 1 – inch margins; Complete sentences;
• Answer the question completely;
• Grades are based on CONTENT.
Memorandum
To:
Professor Jones
From: Bill Jones
RE:
Dixon and Hinton v. United States
Date: March 1, 2015
Question Presented
What crimes have Dixon and Hinton committed?
Short Answer
Bribery
Statement of Facts
The city of Peoria received federal block grants from the Department of Housing and
Urban Development (HUD) under the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974. The
purpose for the grants was the rehabilitation of residential structures, and community
development.
The city designated a community based corporation (UNI) to be in charge of
administering these grants. UNI solicited bids from contractors to perform the work on those
homes that qualified for the program. After soliciting bids it was UNI who awarded the contracts
to the winning bidder.
Arthur Dixson and James Lee Hinton worked for UNI. Dixon and Hinton had a salary
paid for by the Federal government. The entire cost of the rehabilitation program was paid for by
the Federal government
Ora Logsdon was a contractor that received contract from UNI.
Gerald Lilly was a contractor who received contracts from UNI.
Bribery prohibits any “public official” from directly or indirectly asking, demanding,
soliciting, accepting, or receiving anything of value in return for being influenced in the
performance of any official act.
Discussion
Ora Logsdon was a contractor who received contracts from UNI. He testified that
received ten contracts as part of a deal with Dixson and Hinton. Logsdon said the deal was
Dixson and Hinton would award the contracts to him if he paid them 10 percent of the total
amount of the contract.
Gerard Lilly was a contractor who received contracts from UNI. Lilly testified Dixon told
him that if he paid Dixon 10% of the contract price he would receive the contract. Lilly also
testified that Dixon and Hinson helped him prepare bids, and told Lilly that submitting the bids
was a formality. Lilly testified that after receiving the check for the rehabilitation job he
completed he paid Dixson.
Dixon and Hinton tried to argue that they weren’t public officials and therefore the
bribery charge didn’t apply to their situation. However because Dixon and Hinton received a
2
salary from the Federal government while working for a program entirely funded by the Federal
government, they are considered “public officials”.
Conclusion
Because Dixon and Hinton were public officials, and they both asked for and received
kickbacks for the awarding of contracts, they are both guilty of bribery.
3
Memorandum
To:
Professor Jones
From: Bill Jones
RE:
United States v. Virginia
Date: February 14, 2020
Question Presented
What is the legal question presented in this case? What crimes have been committed?
Short Answer
What was the Courts decision?
Statement of Facts
There are two types of facts to include here: (1) Procedural history. This is the “story” of the
case’s progress in the courts, from the time the plaintiff filed its complaint in court, to the
appeal to the court that made the final decision in the case. (2) Legally relevant facts. These
are the events giving rise to the parties’ dispute that the court found necessary to its decision.
Omit other facts. HINT: You will probably not know which facts are legally relevant until you
have read the entire case and understand its holding. Therefore, to avoid an overly long Facts
section, write the Facts portion of your case brief last.
Discussion
This the court’s answer to the Issue posed in the case. A weak statement of the discussion of
the sample Issue above would be “no.” Although a “yes” or “no” holding might be technically
correct, it may not be helpful. For example, if your professor asks you for the holding of Doe v.
Doe, she is not asking for a simple “no” answer. Instead, incorporate into your Discussion the
language of your Issue and the main factual reason why the court answered the Issue the way it
did. Your Discussion should stand on its own. (For example, a good discussion of the above
Issue would be, “The attorney-client privilege does not apply to the inmate’s communications
with the `jailhouse lawyer’ because the inmate did not believe that the `jailhouse lawyer’ was
an actual attorney.”)
Conclusion
Probably the most important part of the case brief, the Conclusion section describes how the
court resolved the Issue. Make sure to summarize all the logical steps the court took in
reaching its Discussion. Keep in mind that the court’s rationale can come from several different
sources, including case precedent, something particular in the facts, and/or public policy.
2

Purchase answer to see full
attachment