Module 5 – Case Mental Health and the Legal System Homework Help

Thomas Szasz: He may be wrong but he may be right

Thomas Szasz is considered a fringe dweller in the philosophy of mental health science. We have run across a few of his ideas earlier in the course, and now I would like you to read one of his writings very carefully and to respond thoughtfully.

Green C. D. (2002) Internet copy writing from The Myth of Mental Illness By Thomas S. Szasz (1960) First published in American Psychologist, 15, 113-118.Retrieved May 21, 2011 from http://psychclassics.yorku.ca/Szasz/myth.htm

In order to assure a thoughtful response no matter what your reaction to the piece, find one way in which Szasz might be right as well as one way in which he might be wrong. Any paper that fails to accomplish this will not receive a good grade.

Due on the first day of Module 6.

Suggested length: 3-4 pages typed and double-spaced.

Assignment Expectations:

The following items in particular will be assessed:

1) Apply critical thinking skills to an argument related to difficulties in defining what mental illness is and how to distinguish its treatment from forms of social control.

2) Application of modular readings when appropriate (APA formatting not required).

The following components should guide your work and will be the criteria by which I will be grading:

Clearly demonstrates an understanding of the relevant concepts.

Clearly exhibits the ability to effectively apply relevant concepts from readings to the case presented.

Uses a logical structure appropriate to paper’s subject and purpose.

Includes a well-developed introduction, summative conclusion, and section headings or clear transition statements.

Uses appropriate, relevant, and compelling content to support ideas, convey understanding of the topic, and shape the whole work.

Paper shows a high level of analysis and evaluation of the data and resources, as well as recognition of differences, contradictions, and biases. Compelling discussion.

Uses words with precise meaning and an appropriate level of specificity. Sentences are varied, yet clearly structured and carefully focused, not long and rambling.

Almost entirely free of errors in spelling, punctuation, and grammar.

Correct in-text referencing. Complete, accurate reference list in consistent standard format.