NRSE4530 Ohio University Nursing Intervention Strategy Discussion For this discussion, choose a nursing intervention strategy that you can use to promote health for a specific family. Review pp 166 171 of your text. Select one of the nursing intervention strategies found (Self-Care Contract: Involvement of all family members; Family Empowerment and Family Strengths-Based Nursing Care; Anticipatory Guidance and Offering Information; Use of Rituals/Routines and Family Time; Family Meal and Healthy Eating). Describe the major points of the strategy you select. Then, identify and describe a family you know who might benefit from the selected strategy. Identify why the family needs to develop this health promotion practice. Explain specifically how you would go about intervening with this family to help them with health promotion activities.
Your initial post must be posted before you can view and respond to colleagues, must contain minimum of two (2) references, in addition to examples from your personal experiences to augment the topic. The goal is to make your post interesting and engaging so others will want to read/respond to it. Synthesize and summarize from your resources in order to avoid the use of direct quotes, which can often be dry and boring. No direct quotes are allowed in the discussion board posts.
References:
Initial Post: Minimum of two (2) total references: one (1) from required course materials and one (1) from peer-reviewed references.
Response posts: Minimum of one (1) total reference: one (1) from peer-reviewed or course materials reference per response.
Words Limits
Initial Post: Minimum 200 words excluding references (approximately one (1) page)
Include introduction and conclusion
Book- Kaakinen, J.R., Coehlo, D. P., Steele, R., Robinson, M. (2018). Family health care nursing:
Theory, practice, and research. Philadelphia, PA: F.A. Davis Company. ..l Sprint
10:28 AM
? 10%
O catmailohio.sharepoint.com
PDF
1 of 1
i
follow
RUBRIC: DISCUSSION BOARD (30 pts)
Levels of Achievement
Criteria
Meets Expectations
Needs Improvement
Unsatisfactory
Characteristics
10 to 10 Points
3 to 9 Points
O to 2 Points
of initial post Provided response with rationale.
Provided response missing either
Provided response with minimal
The post is substantive and reflects careful
substantive rationale, consideration of the rationale.
consideration of the literature.
literature, or examples from the student’s Does not demonstrate thought
Examples from the student’s practice /experience are practice/experience to illustrate the
and provides no supporting
provided to illustrate the iscussion concepts
discussion concepts.
details or examples.
Addressed all required elements of the discussion Addresses all or most of required elements. Provides a general summary of
prompt
Somewhat organized, but may be difficult to required elements.
. Well organized and easy to read.
Support for
5 to 5 Points
2 to 4 Points
O to 1 Points
initial post
. Cited minimum of two references: at least one (1) Missing one (1) required course reference Missing 1 or more of the correct
from required course materials to support rationale AND/OR one (1) peer-reviewed reference to type (course or peer-reviewed)
AND one (1) from peer-reviewed references from validate response.
or number of references to
supplemental materials or independent study on the Post has at least 200 words.
support response.
topic to support responses.
Post is less than 200 words or
The initial post is a minimum of 200 words excluding
there’s no post.
references.
Responses to
10 to 10 Points
4 to 9 Points
O to 3 Points
Peers
Responses to colleagues demonstrated insight and Responses to colleagues are cursory, do not Responses to colleagues lack
critical review of the colleagues’ posts and stimulate stimulate further discussion and paragraph critical, in depth thought and
further discussion
could have been more substantial.
do not add value to the
Responded to a minimum of two (2) peers and Responses missing one of the following: discussion.
included a minimum of one (1) peer-reviewed* or
insight/critical review of colleague’s Responses are missing two or
course materials reference per response.
post,
more of the following:
Responses are a minimum of 100 words and are OOR respond to at least two peers,
o insight/critical review of
posted on different days of the discussion period by OR a peer reviewed or course materials colleagues’ post
the due date.
reference per response
O AND/OR response to at least
Responses are a minimum or less than
two peers
100 words and posts were on the same
AND/OR a peer reviewed
date as initial post
reference per response.
Responses are less than 100
words, posted same day as
initial post
APA format*;
5 to 5 Points
2 to 4 Points
O to 1 Points
Spelling/
APA format** is used for in-text citations and
APA format is missing either in-text or at Not APA formatted OR APA
Grammar/
reference list.
end of the reference list.
format of references has errors
Punctuation Posts contain grammatically correct sentences Posts contain some grammatically correct both in-text and at end of
without any spelling errors.
sentences with few spelling errors.
reference list.
Post is grammatically incorrect.
NOTE: No direct quotes are allowed in the discussion board posts.
*Peer-reviewed references include professional journals (i.e. Nursing Education Perspectives, Journal of Professional Nursing, etc. – see library tab on how to access these from
database searches), professional organizations (NLN, CDC, AACN, ADA, etc.) applicable to population and practice area, along with clinical practice guidelines (CPGs – National
Guideline Clearinghouse). All references must be no older than five years (unless making a specific point using a seminal piece of information) References not acceptable (not inclusive)
are UpToDate, Epocrates, Medscape, WebMD, hospital organizations, insurance recommendations, & secondary clinical databases.
**Since it is difficult to edit the APA reference in the Blackboard discussion area, you can copy and paste APA references from your Word document to the Blackboard discussion area
and points will not be deducted because of format changes in spacing
Last updated: 02/02/2017
© 2017 School of Nursing – Ohio University
Page 1 of 1
1
m
Purchase answer to see full
attachment
Delivering a high-quality product at a reasonable price is not enough anymore.
That’s why we have developed 5 beneficial guarantees that will make your experience with our service enjoyable, easy, and safe.
You have to be 100% sure of the quality of your product to give a money-back guarantee. This describes us perfectly. Make sure that this guarantee is totally transparent.
Each paper is composed from scratch, according to your instructions. It is then checked by our plagiarism-detection software. There is no gap where plagiarism could squeeze in.
Thanks to our free revisions, there is no way for you to be unsatisfied. We will work on your paper until you are completely happy with the result.