Music in 1990s Discussion 1. The 1990s The 1990s was a period of diverse musical styles. Pick one and research in depth the characteristics, artists and c

Music in 1990s Discussion 1. The 1990s

The 1990s was a period of diverse musical styles. Pick one and research in depth the characteristics, artists and culture that accompanied the genre. Create a mind map or other data visualization tool with your results showing the histories and tendencies, the major artists and their contribution to the genre and any other information you find relevant.

2. The Rock and Roll Hall of Fame

Pick your favorite artist who may or may not be inducted to the Rock and Roll Hall of Fame. Write a report about this artist’s major contributions to rock and roll and tell us why the artist should be included. Justify your selection with facts.

3. The Grammy Awards

Select an award and the performer, individual or group, who deserves the award for the next Annual Grammy Awards. You can choose any category and field but you must substantiate your nomination with enough evidence to convince others that your nomination should win. Justify your nomination with a short summary of your reasons. If you prefer, you can make the case for a performer or group who wasn’t nominated in the most recent past Grammy Awards and explain why they should have won! Question: This paper will be an annotated bibliography, specifically focusing on implementing
Enterprise Risk Management (ERM) in health care industry.
Instructions:
•
Make sure that all your resources relate to this theme. (Remember this annotated
bibliography must be build on your concept map and paper).
•
Need minimum 1000 words.
•
In this assignment, your annotations should do of the following:
o Summarize:
?
Some annotations merely summarize the source.
?
What are the main arguments?
?
What is the point of this book or article?
?
What topics are covered?
?
If someone asked what this article/book is about, what would you say?
?
The length of your annotations will determine how detailed your summary
is.
o Assess:
?
After summarizing a source, it may be helpful to evaluate it. Is it a useful
source?
?
How does it compare with other sources in your bibliography?
?
Is the information reliable? Is this source biased or objective?
?
What is the goal of this source?
?
How is this source useful to the paper that I am creating?
o Reflect:
?
Once you’ve summarized and assessed a source, you need to ask how it
fits into your research. Was this source helpful to you?
?
How does it help you shape your argument?
?
How can you use this source in your research project?
?
Has it changed how you think about your topic?
o Relevance:
?
For the annotated Bibliography , you are not being asked to include ALL
the articles you will use in your final paper. Rather, you asked to select KEY
literature that is central and essential to your position, literature review or
theoretical paper.
•
Minimum 7 APA References
o Be current. Published within the last few years.
o Be peer-reviewed. That means the paper must have undergone a formal peer
review before being published in a journal or presented at a conference. You must
ensure that your resources have undergone rigorous reviews. In most cases, you
can find out the review process for a conference or journal by visiting the
appropriate web site. Do not simply assume that a resource is peer reviewed check it out.
•
Here are a few URLs with additional information: (I strongly suggest that you look at
these.)
o https://sites.umuc.edu/library/libhow/bibliography_apa.cfm
o https://www.bethel.edu/library/research/apa-annobib-sixth.pdf
o http://libguides.enc.edu/writing_basics/annotatedbib/apa
“Rules! rules! rules!” section
o http://guides.library.cornell.edu/annotatedbibliography
o https://owl.english.purdue.edu/owl/resource/614/03/

Purchase answer to see full
attachment