IT550 Southern New Microsoft Company Strategic Outcomes Paper Guidelines for Submission: The strategic outcomes paper should follow these guidelines: two t

IT550 Southern New Microsoft Company Strategic Outcomes Paper Guidelines for Submission: The strategic outcomes paper should follow these guidelines: two to three pages in length, double spacing, 12-point Times New Roman font, one-inch margins, APA format, and a minimum of two sources.Attached is the guidelines and rubrics. I also going to attached the SWOT analysis that you did. IT 550 Final Project Milestone Three Rubric
For this milestone you will submit a complete a strategic outcomes document that synthesizes the information from the first two milestones. Develop the
strategic outcomes that are aligned to the conclusions from your SWOT analysis in order to mitigate threats, strengthen weak areas, and capitalize on
organizational strengths and opportunities. In addition, your document should map back to the mission and vision statements of the organization and should
model best practices in IT governance supported by the standards and regulations of your organization’s industry. Additional legal and regulatory implications, as
they pertain to the acquisition, implementation, and general use of information technology, should also be addressed.
The following critical elements will be addressed in this submission:
?
Strategic Outcomes: You will craft strategic outcomes for your department or subgroup that, as a set of outcomes, adhere to the following:
A. SWOT: Your strategic outcomes should represent your conclusions from the SWOT. In other words, the outcomes you create should be aligned
with identified strengths and opportunities of the organization and address identified weaknesses and threats.
B. Vision, Mission, Values: Your outcomes should align to the values of the organization and the IT values of your own department, as well as with
the vision you articulated for your group and the mission statement you crafted.
C. Ethics and Law: Outcomes should also model best practices in IT governance, as supported by external and internal IT standards.
Guidelines for Submission: The strategic outcomes paper should follow these guidelines: two to three pages in length, double spacing, 12-point Times New
Roman font, one-inch margins, APA format, and a minimum of two sources.
Critical Elements
Strategic Outcomes:
SWOT
Strategic Outcomes:
Vision, Mission,
Values
Exemplary (100%)
Meets “Proficient” criteria and
evidences sophisticated skills in
creating outcomes that align to
key and pertinent conclusions of
SWOT analysis without focus on
superfluous or unnecessary
information
Meets “Proficient” criteria and
outcomes exemplify the
identified mission, vision, and
values of the IT group and
organization in a balanced or
nuanced manner
Proficient (90%)
Crafted outcomes clearly and
logically align and address the
SWOT analysis conclusions
Needs Improvement (70%)
Crafted outcomes do not clearly
or do not logically align to and
address the SWOT analysis
conclusions
Not Evident (0%)
Does not craft outcomes in
consideration of the SWOT
analysis conclusions
Crafted outcomes clearly and
directly align to the mission,
vision, and values of the
organization and IT group
Crafted outcomes align to the
mission, vision, and values of
the organization and IT group,
but alignment is not always
clear or direct
Does not craft outcomes in
consideration of the mission,
vision, and values of the
organization and IT group
Value
30
30
Strategic Outcomes:
Ethics and Law
Articulation of
Response
Meets “Proficient” criteria and
outcomes embody the ethical
and legal guidelines relevant for
the outcomes, IT group, and
organizational industry without
unnecessary restriction to
strategic action on the
outcomes
Submission is free of errors
related to citations, grammar,
spelling, syntax, and
organization and is presented in
a professional and easy-to-read
format
Crafted outcomes model best
practices in IT governance
through adherence to
established standards and
ethical codes of the organization
Crafted outcomes do not always
adhere to established standards
and ethical codes of the
organization to model best
practices
Does not craft outcomes in
consideration of best practices
in IT governance
30
Submission has no major errors
related to citations, grammar,
spelling, syntax, or organization
Submission has major errors
related to citations, grammar,
spelling, syntax, or organization
that negatively impact
readability and articulation of
main ideas
Submission has critical errors
related to citations, grammar,
spelling, syntax, or organization
that prevent understanding of
ideas
10
Earned Total
100%
1
Running head: SWOT ANALYSIS
SWOT Analysis
Sandy Camacho
Southern New Hampshire University
2
SWOT ANALYSIS
Introduction
Microsoft is a worldwide corporate organization that makes software products including
Microsoft Office, Microsoft edge web browsers, Microsoft Windows and Internet Explorer. The
corporation is responsible for manufacturing, supporting, licensing, and selling electronics,
software’s, and multipurpose personal computers (Microsoft, 2016). With its headquarters in
Redmond, Washington Microsoft is the largest software maker in the world, and the corporate
also makes hardware products like the video gaming brand, Microsoft Xbox video gaming
console, and personal computers. This paper will analyze the Strengths, Weaknesses,
Opportunities, and Threats (SWOT) of Microsoft Company.
Strengths
Localization has boosted the performance of Microsoft services in most parts of the
world, making it achieve higher returns and curb competition. The company uses other
manufacturers in realizing operations in case the current ones do not match up to their needs.
Microsoft has different sources of components, raw materials, and supplies and it is also able to
get the materials at a discount since it purchases in high volumes. Such strategies and
diversification of products and services have made Microsoft relevant despite competition from
Apple, Google, and Oracle. The company is achieving its purpose and integrating its activities
annually, evaluating and rewarding employees to being resilient in the competitive market. The
company primarily has more wins than losses, hence making it have high stock training even
with occasional failures.
Weaknesses
However, Microsoft experiences some gaps, including unresolved legal proceedings in
product design, and it also lags in innovations as compared to other brands like Apple. Countries
3
SWOT ANALYSIS
like China and India can counterfeit the Microsoft software business an operation that the
company has failed to control (Sun, 2015). The company plans to meet the challenges by
changing to razor and blade models whereby it offers cheap software to stop counterfeiting hence
more revenue. New strategic partnership alliances can also help curb competition, and the
company sets out to capitalize in response to the growing demand for smartphones.
Opportunities
External factors globally tend to affect the corporate regarding new opportunities and
challenges. These factors reflect on the operations of computers, software, and hardware in
Microsoft’s market. The factors that promote new opportunities for the company include political
stability, governmental support for autonomy, and the increase of agreements in international
trade. They pave the way for the company to be more resilient in the economy market. Economic
factors such as rapid development countries through technology, financial stability, and the
growth of disposable income for the middle class also contribute to the opportunities that the
corporation gets with time. The company, therefore, experiences balance since there is a constant
demand for high-quality customer service that provides an increased preference for green
products and recyclable materials.
Threats
The threats of Microsoft Company mostly are from technology whereby competition
arises due to the rapid growth of mobile technology, and increasing cultural diversity. Online
transactions are also on the increase, and thus many corporations are emerging to give
competition to Microsoft (Sun, 2015). Legal issues also affect the corporation in that there is an
increase in the disposal of waste laws and regulations that might be expensive for the company to
meet. The company should focus on opportunities to boost its expansion and goals. The company
4
SWOT ANALYSIS
can also make use of other regulations that favor them like the improved patent laws and energy
consumption laws that allow it to be prosperous.
SWOT Summary
Microsoft Company is dominant because it is a reputed brand that continuously
prioritizes innovations in technology through firm researches and development. Its strengths in
product portfolio for different consumer classes create a broad market for distribution and offers
the best operating system for computers in the world. The weaknesses of unresolved proceedings
on product designs require the company to provide cheap software to compete favorably. On the
other hand, opportunities such as government support which fosters its development through
encouraging international trade to expand its market operations globally. Technological changes
are threats that can be resolved by encouraging more revenue sources to cope up with the new
trends in the market.
Conclusion
Microsoft’s company will obtain the right amount of revenue, and its share prices by
trading at a premium which enables the continuity of the growth prospect. With its profitable
business model, the company can increase its stock prices by attracting more potential investors.
They can achieve this by developing the precise products and services that the consumer needs.
Adoption of the SWOT analysis will enable Microsoft to beat Amazon in cloud computing, an
operation that Amazon founded. The primary outcomes of Microsoft and strongholds will help in
creating a bigger web thus attracting more customers.
5
SWOT ANALYSIS
References
Microsoft. (2016). Empower every person and organization to achieve more Microsoft
Enterprise. Retrieved from https://enterprise.microsoft.com/enus/articles/industries/government/immersion-experience
Sun, L. (2015). SWOT Analysis of Microsoft Corporation. Retrieved from
https://www.fool.com/investing/general/2015/06/28/swot-analysis-of-microsoftcorporation.aspx

Purchase answer to see full
attachment