BUL 3320 University of South Florida Intellectual Property Scenarios Discussion Select ONE of the following scenarios. Prepare a response of at least 5 ful

BUL 3320 University of South Florida Intellectual Property Scenarios Discussion Select ONE of the following scenarios. Prepare a response of at least 5 fully developed paragraphs

Scenario 1: Intellectual Property

Professor Olsen teaches business law for Fowler University, a for-profit school in Boston. Several times during the semester, Professor Olsen made copies of articles and distributed them to her students. The daughter of one of the article’s authors was a student in her class. The daughter told her mother about Olsen’s copying, which took place without the mother’s or publisher’s permission. The mother sued Olsen and the University for copyright infringement.

Professor Olsen also copied images from the Internet to use in her Powerpoint presentations. Most of the images were not in the public domain and no attributions to sources were provided. Respond to BOTH the following potential lawsuits.

Lawsuit 1: Mother v. Olsen

Provide arguments for each party. Determine which party will win. Provide support for the arguments and the final answer with cases or scholarly articles.

Lawsuit 2: Copyright of Images

Has Professor Olsen violated any laws by using the images in her PowerPoint presentations? Explain.

Scenario 2: Intellectual Property

Discuss the ATTACHED article involving the American Chemical Society v. Aaron Zemetres. The case was settled out of court. How should a judge or arbitrator rule?

Silvestrini, E. (2011). Lawsuit: USF student violated copyright on study guide. The Tampa Tribune. (Located in the USF Online Library).

Scenario 3: Intellectual Property

Calista worked part time as a barista at Bayview in St. Petersburg while attending the University of South Florida full time. As part of her final project for a degree in information technology, Calista designed a computer program that provided the fastest and most economical routes for delivery drivers. The program also tracked the locations of drivers. Calista called the program Fast Route & Tracker (FRT). The program was designed to be used by any type of delivery service and not just the food industry. When Bayview found out about the software, they claimed they owned the program since Calista was employed by the company when she developed the program. Calista believes she owns the rights to the invention since it was created for her school project and could be used for any type of delivery company.

Provide arguments for Calista and Bayview regarding ownership of the invention, Fast Route & Tracker. Determine which party should win and provide support for your answer.