University of South Alabama Advanced Practice Registered Nurses Paper A discussion needs to be written. Instructions and rubric are attached. A discussion

University of South Alabama Advanced Practice Registered Nurses Paper A discussion needs to be written. Instructions and rubric are attached. A discussion needs to be written. Instructions and rubric are attached. A discussion needs to be written. Instructions and rubric are attached. Instructions
Each student will submit an initial discussion post of approximately 750-1000
words in the discussion. Support your discussion with at least 5 references, the
majority of which should be peer-reviewed. Primary references should be
published within the last five (5) years. No title page is required.
/3 Describe how barring APRNs from full practice authority affects (a)
healthcare costs, (b) access to and/or delivery of care, and (c) quality of
care. Discuss each required factor individually and support your conclusions
with current research data and examples.
/3 Discuss several ways that the Nurse Licensure Compact (NLC) increases
access to care while promoting public safety. (The connections you include are
up to you, but since we deal with natural disaster often on the gulf coast, you
may consider addressing this in your discussion or our current global health
crisis.) Based on your research of both the NLC and APRN compact licensure,
what impact can we anticipate APRN compact licensure to make? This may
include client care, education, or administrative perspectives.
/2 Discuss the status of implementation of the APRN Consensus Model in your
home state or the state where you currently reside. This section should include
all of the following:
•
•
•
•
•
What titles are used for APRNs? Are all four APRN roles recognized in your
state? If not, which roles are not recognized?
Is the term “licensure” used for APRN roles in your state? If not, what
term(s) are used?
Is a graduate or post graduate degree required in your state to practice in an
advanced practice role?
Is national certification required in your state to practice in an advanced
practice role?
Do APRN roles allow for independent practice in your state? Not
independent? No authority?
•
Do the APRN roles allow for independent prescribing in your state? Not
independent? No authority?
/2 If you were responsible for evaluating positive change regarding the full
realization of the APRN role, what outcomes would signify progression in the
resolution of APRN barriers? To answer this question develop a (a) patientbased, (b) system-based, and (c) policy-based outcome that would guide your
evaluation into your discussion. Provide support from the literature for
each. See diagram in Required Resources for examples of each type of
outcome.
/1.5 Identify and discuss legislation in your state legislature regarding the
APRN role. Include the bill number and title as applicable.
•
Is there legislation currently being proposed in your state legislature
regarding the APRN role? Has there been previous state legislation that has
failed? To find out, go to LegiScan (Links to an external site.) and search for
current state legislation. Use search terms such as “nurse”, “nursing”,
“APRN,” etc. Discuss your findings.
RUBRIC
Consensus Model Discussion
Consensus Model Discussion
Criteria
This criterion is
linked to a
Learning
Outcome
Full Practice
Authority
1. Discussion
regarding the
implications of
barring APRNs
from fullpractice
authority.
2. Addresses (a)
healthcare costs,
(b) access to
and/or delivery
of care, and (c)
quality of care.
Ratings
3.0 pts
Fully Met
The discussion
is well
developed and
clearly
describes how
each of the
following
factors are
affected by
allowing
APRNs to have
full practice
authority: (a)
healthcare
costs, (b)
access to care,
(c) delivery of
care, and (d)
quality of care.
Each
component of
the discussion
is supported
with peerreviewed
literature.
2.0 pts
Partially Met
The discussion is
missing a factor
or requires
additional
development, as
evidenced by
only addressing
that the
mentioned
factors are
affected by
barring full
practice
authority but not
describing how.
Additional
support required
for conclusions.
Pts
1.0 pts
Minimally
Met
Two (2) or
more of the
required
factors are
missing or
support for
the factors
is absent or
minimal.
0.0 pts
Not Met
The section
is absent,
minimally
developed,
or addresses
material
other than
what was
required.
3.0 pts
Consensus Model Discussion
Criteria
This criterion is
linked to a
Learning
Outcome
Nurse Licensure
Compact
1. Discuss the
impact of the
NLC on access
and safety.
2. Make
inferences about
the outcomes of
an APRN
compact.
Ratings
3.0 pts
Fully Met
The
discussion
addresses how
the NLC
affects
multiple
aspects of
access to care
and safety.
The student
uses available
evidence to
make
educated
predictions
about the
impact of an
APRN
compact.
Support from
the evidence
for
conclusions is
provided.
2.0 pts
Partially Met
The student
addresses each
of the posed
questions.
Connections
between the
provided
evidence and the
student’s
conclusions are
unclear or
support from the
evidence could
be improved.
Alternatively,
although
sufficiently
developed and
supported, the
student only
addresses one of
the required
questions.
Pts
1.0 pts
Minimally
Met
The student
addresses one
of the posed
questions but
not the other:
NLC or
APRN
compact. In
addition,
support
provided is
inadequately
developed or
unclear in its
relationship to
the task.
0.0 pts
Not Met
The section
is absent,
minimally
developed,
or
addresses
material
other than
what was
required.
3.0 pts
Consensus Model Discussion
Criteria
This criterion is
linked to a
Learning
Outcome
State
Implementation
1. Discussion of
implementation
of the consensus
model in their
home or current
state.
2. Addresses
titles, licensure,
degree
requirements,
certification,
independent
practice, and
prescription
authority.
This criterion is
linked to a
Learning
Outcome
Outcome
Development
1. Develops a
patient, system,
and policy-based
outcome
signifying
progression of
the APRN role.
2. Support is
provided from
the literature.
Ratings
2.0 pts
Fully Met
The discussion
completely meets
the requirements
by clearly
including
statements to
address each
question posed in
all six (6) of the
bullets for the
corresponding
section of the
rubric.
2.0 pts
Fully Met
Section
includes the
development
of an outcome
statement for
all three
required
categories:
policy,
system, and
patient. The
validity of
each is
supported
with evidence
from the
literature.
1.5 pts
Partially
Met
One (1) of
the bullet
points is not
addressed or
one (1) to
two (2) of the
questions
posed in the
bulleted list
have been
excluded
from the
discussion.
1.5 pts
Partially Met
The student
address all three of
the outcome types
as required but
displays some
misunderstanding
about the type of
support that is
appropriate for
each.
Pts
1.0 pts
Minimally
Met
Three (3) of
the bullets
are not
addressed or
more than 2
of the posed
questions are
excluded
from the
discussion.
0.5 pts
Minimally
Met
The section
does not
clearly
include a
statement
for each of
the assigned
categories
and/or
support is
absent or
minimal.
0.0 pts
Not Met
The section
is absent,
minimally
developed,
or addresses
material
other than
what was
required.
0.0 pts
Not Met
The section
is absent,
minimally
developed,
or
addresses
material
other than
what was
required.
2.0 pts
2.0 pts
Consensus Model Discussion
Criteria
This criterion is
linked to a
Learning
Outcome
Current APRN
Legislation
1. Identifies and
describes statelevel legislation.
2. Includes the
bill number and
title as
applicable.
Ratings
1.5 pts
Proficient
Legislation
related to the
APRN role
from the
student’s
current state is
identified
using the bill
number and/or
title as
appropriate.
The purpose
of the
legislation and
the ultimate
outcome are
discussed.
1.0 pts
Partially Met
Legislation
related to the
APRN role
from the
student’s
current state is
identified using
the bill number
and/or title as
appropriate.
The discussion
of the purpose
of the
legislation
and/or the
ultimate
outcome are
inadequately
addressed.
0.5 pts
Minimally
Met
Legislation
related to the
APRN role
from the
student’s
current state is
identified
using the bill
number and/or
title as
appropriate.
The discussion
of the purpose
of the
legislation
and/or the
ultimate
outcome are
absent.
Pts
0.0 pts
Not Met
The section
is absent,
minimally
developed,
or
addresses
material
other than
what was
required.
1.5 pts

Purchase answer to see full
attachment