University of New Haven Industry to Industry Pollution Prevention Paper In response to environmental trends, the behavior of private companies is changing.

University of New Haven Industry to Industry Pollution Prevention Paper In response to environmental trends, the behavior of private companies is changing. As we have
seen and heard, there are many examples of corporate change in response to environmental
concerns and pressure. Additionally, there are some regulatory programs that have taken hold –
packaging take back laws, eco-labeling schemes, public reporting of emissions data, etc.
Another dimension of the private company, its public relations division, has also become more
active in the area of pollution prevention and sustainability. One consequence of this is the
possibility that these efforts become statements based more on wishful thinking and the desire to
appear socially responsible, and less on technological advances and robust environmental
programs. As we read in the Huffington Post article in Module 4, “It’s time…to do more than just
flashy environmental public relations.”
So as we observe this gradual, voluntary evolution in companies away from profit-seeking
behavior toward more sustainably comprehensive goals, it begs the following question: Could
more progress be made if there were serious, mandated policies requiring the integration of
pollution prevention and environmental sustainability into a company’s business plan?
For your final project, you will explore this concept of required pollution prevention policies:
You are the Administrator for the US Environmental Protection Agency. The President
has called you into his office and expressed some dissatisfaction with the lack of pollution
prevention statutes and regulations. He is unimpressed with the ‘voluntary’ approach to
pollution prevention and sustainability, and he gives you the responsibility of developing a
set of policies that will “make us a sustainable country in one generation” (25 years).
Content
Craft a set of three (3) policy mechanisms you would propose to accomplish this goal. Address
the following policy attributes when developing your policies:
a. Effective in changing the behavior of private companies.
b. Effective in encouraging the development of new more environmentally preferred
technologies.
c. Publicly acceptable.
d. Cheap to implement.
Address these questions in your policy mechanisms also:
Will your policies require changes to existing government-industry regulatory
relationships?
Will you make your policies enforceable, and how so, and by whom?Attached within are more details titled Final Project. Also included are two relavent essays. https://www.thestar.com.my/tech/tech-news/2013/09/23/does-it-benefit-your-company-to-go-green/https://www.theguardian.com/sustainable-business/blog/time-businesses-go-green-roi Final Project
In response to environmental trends, the behavior of private companies is changing. As we have
seen and heard, there are many examples of corporate change in response to environmental
concerns and pressure. Additionally, there are some regulatory programs that have taken hold –
packaging take back laws, eco-labeling schemes, public reporting of emissions data, etc.
Another dimension of the private company, its public relations division, has also become more
active in the area of pollution prevention and sustainability. One consequence of this is the
possibility that these efforts become statements based more on wishful thinking and the desire to
appear socially responsible, and less on technological advances and robust environmental
programs. As we read in the Huffington Post article in Module 4, “It’s time…to do more than just
flashy environmental public relations.”
So as we observe this gradual, voluntary evolution in companies away from profit-seeking
behavior toward more sustainably comprehensive goals, it begs the following question: Could
more progress be made if there were serious, mandated policies requiring the integration of
pollution prevention and environmental sustainability into a company’s business plan?
For your final project, you will explore this concept of required pollution prevention policies:
You are the Administrator for the US Environmental Protection Agency. The President
has called you into his office and expressed some dissatisfaction with the lack of pollution
prevention statutes and regulations. He is unimpressed with the ‘voluntary’ approach to
pollution prevention and sustainability, and he gives you the responsibility of developing a
set of policies that will “make us a sustainable country in one generation” (25 years).
Content
Craft a set of three (3) policy mechanisms you would propose to accomplish this goal. Address
the following policy attributes when developing your policies:
a. Effective in changing the behavior of private companies.
b. Effective in encouraging the development of new more environmentally preferred
technologies.
c. Publicly acceptable.
d. Cheap to implement.
Address these questions in your policy mechanisms also:
Will your policies require changes to existing government-industry regulatory
relationships?
Will you make your policies enforceable, and how so, and by whom?
Make sure to review and include what you have already written in this course. Pay particular
attention to:
o
Module Assignments
o
Journal Entries
o
Discussion Posts
Submission of Final Paper
Use the Assignment tool in Module 6 to upload your Microsoft Word document. In addition,
attach your project to the Final Discussion question.
Writing Mechanics
Pay attention to your writing mechanics – your paper should be free of spelling, punctuation, and
grammar errors. Properly cite any sources you use via APA citation style, which refers to the
rules and conventions for documenting sources used in a research paper. APA style requires both
in-text citations and a reference list. For every in-text citation there should be a full citation in the
reference list and vice versa.
Length
At least 5 but no more than 12 pages
Format
Microsoft Word. Times New Roman, 12 pt., double spaced
Grading
The Attached Rubric will be used for Grading.
Due Date: June 27, 2019, by 11:59 midnight
Feedback to all classmates projects due June 29th by midnight.
1
MODULE 4 JOURNAL
Antoine Wroten
University of New Haven
CIVL-6610-80-SUI19
Professor Farren
2
The question of this week’s Journal, “Do you think enough is being done by companies
to reduce the environmental impacts of their products”, is a difficult question to answer. In my
opinion, many companies are aware of the fact that consumers are increasingly growing wary of
the products and services they use and the environmental impacts of such products and services.
With that fact in mind, many companies are attempting to address such concerns by becoming
socially responsible corporate entities. In fact, an examination by MIT found that a company’s
number one reason for going green is Company or Brand image (Patti & Jack Phillips). Circling
back to the question my answer would be yes and no and here is why.
Many companies are taking steps to go green to simply to not be labeled the bad guy and
with such motivation, green implementation and success can end up being lackadaisical. For
instance, Wal-Mart’s sustainability initiatives were rolled out to much fanfare but as uncovered
by investigative reporting it was much ado about nothing (Sheppard). Companies must really
commit to going green with sound projects that typically not only help the environment but more
often than not these initiatives help the bottom lines of companies by reducing cost (Patti & Jack
Phillips). It is easy to see which competing philosophy wins out and why; you simply have to
follow the money. Going green cannot be viewed as a burden or something to do to simply
satisfy perception but it needs to be pursued as an opportunity to profit while simultaneously
benefiting the environment.
3
REFERENCES
Coolidge, A. (2014, June 01). Balancing act for P&G: Going green at right price. Retrieved from
https://www.usatoday.com/story/money/business/2014/06/01/balancing-act-for-pg-going-greenat-right-price-/9800317/
Proctor and Gamble, P&G External Relations. GBU F&HC. (2003, October 23). Cutting
Environmental Effect by half: Compact detergents can do it![Press release]. Retrieved from
https://blackboard.newhaven.edu/bbcswebdav/pid-1515753-dt-content-rid22976520_1/courses/CIVL-6610-80-SUI19/LCA – P&G.pdf
Online, T. S. (2015, October 18). Does it benefit your company to go green? Retrieved from
https://www.thestar.com.my/tech/tech-news/2013/09/23/does-it-benefit-your-company-to-gogreen/
Patti and Jack Phillips for the Guardian Professional Network. (2010, November 18). Why it’s time
for businesses to go green. Retrieved from https://www.theguardian.com/sustainablebusiness/blog/time-businesses-go-green-roi
Sheppard, K., & Sheppard, K. (2013, November 13). Walmart’s Climate Record Doesn’t Live Up To
Promises, Report Finds. Retrieved from https://www.huffpost.com/entry/walmartsustainability_n_4263032
1
ECONOMIC ANAYLSIS/ PAYBACK DISCUSSION
Antoine Wroten
University of New Haven
CIVL-6610-80-SUI19
Professor Farren
2
When it comes down to deciding on a P2 project for my home, or even an energyefficient purchase in my life like a hybrid car I most certainly implore a traditional economic
analyses/payback period. In fact, I have mused over the idea of purchasing a hybrid vehicle
before but when it comes down to it, the financials often do not favor a new hybrid vehicle. I
have lived in Baltimore for quite some time however I have worked in the DC metropolitan area
for almost a decade. My daily commute is around 100 miles total, so the idea of adding a vehicle
that has an mpg rating of over twice as many gallons as my current daily driver is very
appealing. Despite the appeal, the financials have to make sense and it appears I am not alone in
this train of thought, as stated in the NY Times article by Jesse Toprak, “The point where a car
can actually go after a mass-market audience is when the pricing starts making sense on paper”
(Bunkley). The eco-friendly car simply has not taken off because a car is a significant purchase
for individuals and if the fuel savings does not pass the payback test many will simply opt out
and buy a typical combustion engine model including myself.
Beyond the eco-friendly car debate, I am of the same mindset when it comes to P2
projects with my home. A home is another major purchase an individual will make, whether it’s
the “starter” home or the “forever” home, people will make decisions based on sound financials
rather than simply doing something better for the environment. With that said, there are very few
homes in my neighborhood with solar paneled roofs, fewer cool roofs and none with green roofs.
Although people including myself are very aware of the need for eco-friendly alternatives major
P2 projects are not typically a priority if the financial payback does not make sense. I will elect
to pay for an energy efficient appliance over a non-efficient appliance but more often than not
the payback via energy savings pays for the appliance in a year or two minimum.
3
References
Bunkley, N. (2012, April 04). For Hybrid and Electric Cars to Pay Off, Owners Must
Wait. Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com/2012/04/05/business/energy-environment/forhybrid-and-electric-cars-to-pay-off-owners-must-wait.html?pagewanted=all&_r=0

Purchase answer to see full
attachment