Understanding approaches to public health Homework Help

Understanding approaches to public health

Topic: Understanding approaches to public health

Order Description
Assignment brief:
Understanding approaches to public health
• Write a 3000 word essay choosing an area of intervention from within the Public Health Arena; for example, healthy eating, Smoking, Diabetic care, Mental Health (can you do smoking for me)
• Also identify one policy which underpins your chosen intervention.
• Use Beatties model of health promotion to critically analyse your chosen intervention ensuring you use all four segments of the model.
• Discuss strengths and limitations of approaches for your chosen intervention.
• Discuss evaluation that has been used to gauge the effectiveness of your chosen intervention. (the critical assessment of the value of an intervention)
• Make sure you include health inequalities and how they are tackled using both UK and international policies.

Assignment marking criteria:

Percentage Descriptor
90-100%
Outstanding Exceptionally detailed and original response to the
assignment, with critical use of independently sourced contextual material.
Outstanding demonstration of linked understanding and application of relevant theory, concepts and models. Extremely well structured with high level of analysis.

No obvious errors in referencing or grammar or syntax as appropriate.
80-89%
Excellent Very full, independent response to the
assignment with totally relevant material which is well beyond any module input, demonstrating independent study. Excellent understanding and application of relevant theory, concepts and models.

Very clear logical structure.
Very few errors in referencing or grammar or syntax as appropriate.

70-79%
Very good Full response to the assignment with all
content relevant and focused. Very good understanding of relevant theory, concepts and models. Application of appropriate theory to examples/practice, demonstrating a rigorous approach to a
variety of ideas, contexts and frameworks.

Few errors in referencing or grammar or syntax as appropriate.
60-69%
Good Answers most if not all detailed aspects of
the question. Content mainly relevant and accurate. Good knowledge and understanding of relevant theory and concepts and application of theoretical models. Evidence of a developing appreciation of contextual issues.

Some small repeated errors in referencing or grammar or syntax as appropriate
50-59%
Competent Main issues addressed and solid attempt
to answer question. Some relevant content
applied. Sound knowledge and understanding of relevant theory and concepts and identification of main issues
Some repeated errors in referencing or grammar or syntax as appropriate.
40-49%
Pass Satisfactory attempt to address
question/issues with some content relevant to assignment topic. Material engages with relevant module materials, but largely repeats taught input and lacks development or personal interpretation. Some general understanding of topic theory and concepts. Lacks coherence.

30-39%
Fail Some learning outcomes and / or
assessment criteria not met.

Questions not answered fully. Content not wholly relevant. Little or no evidence of understanding of relevant theory. Very repetitive of taught input – no development or application. The use of extensive quoted passages evident.

Evidence of sufficient grasp of learning outcomes to suggest that the student will be able to retrieve the module on resubmission.

20-29%
Fail No learning outcomes fully met. Little attempt to engage with the module materials or ideas.

10% – 19%
Fail Little attempt to engage with assignment brief and has not met learning outcomes. Inadequate demonstration of knowledge or understanding of key concepts, theories or practice.

0-9%
Fail No real attempt to address the assignment
brief or learning outcomes