Description
The Books required Irene Rubing 9th edition or The Classical Liberal Constitution by Richard Epstein Both are great to reference off However The Writer MUST Have 1 or the either to BID This is a paper that SIMPLY needs to be edited and organized with the following information and along with file direction. Please make sure that ALL questions Highlighted is answer. Please highlight the answer in green highlighter. NO COVER LETTER & NO Plagiarism 3 pages of original that covers each question in the file. (Abstract & appendices is needed to be added). This paper must be in current APA format with 1-inch margins, must be in 12-pt, Times New Roman font. You must include citations to a sufficient number of appropriate sources to fully support your assertions and conclusions (which will likely require more than the minimum number of citations); the paper must contain citations to a minimum of 6 sources not including the course textbook, assigned readings, and the Bible. Analyzing the potential implications of federalism on the policies and politics of public budgeting. Write a research paper analyzing the concept of federalism as it applies to the politics and policy of public budgeting. Specifically, you will need to provide a nuanced analysis and explanation of 1) the role and/or impact of federalism in maintaining constitutionally limited federal government, 2) the potential impact of federalism on federal level public budgeting; 3) the impacts of federal agency spending on public budgeting; and 4) a Judeo-Christian analysis of the concepts of federalism in public budgeting. This is a research paper analyzing and evaluating Federalism. The text of this research paper You must add 3 pages that is above and highlighted . (Abstract & appendices is needed to be added). This paper must be in current APA format with 1-inch margins, must be in 12-pt, Times New Roman font. You must include citations to a sufficient number of appropriate sources to fully support your assertions and conclusions (which will likely require more than the minimum number of citations); the paper must contain citations to a minimum of 6 sources not including the course textbook, assigned readings, and the Bible. ALL work must be ran thru. This is a paper that needs to be on a Professional and Scholar Mastery Writting
Dr.
Abstract
This paper discusses biblical principles in ways that interpersonal leadership is applied in organizational leadership and how that consequently influences best communication practices. The paper is divided into interpersonal leadership, organizational leadership, interpersonal leadership and organizational leadership, Statesmanship and Organizational Leadership. This paper concludes that interpersonal relationships between leaders and their followers in all departments foster the best atmosphere for the best communication practices through evidence-based discussion.
Federalism Paper
Analyzing the potential implications of federalism on the policies and politics of public budgeting. Write a research paper analyzing the concept of federalism as it applies to the politics and policy of public budgeting. Specifically, you will need to provide a nuanced analysis and explanation of 1) the role and/or impact of federalism in maintaining constitutionally limited federal government, 2) the potential impact of federalism on federal level public budgeting; 3) the impacts of federal agency spending on public budgeting; and 4) a Judeo-Christian analysis of the concepts of federalism in public budgeting.
This is a research paper analyzing and evaluating Federalism.
The text of this research paper You must add 3 pages that is above and highlighted . (Abstract & appendices is needed to be added). This paper must be in current APA format with 1-inch margins, must be in 12-pt, Times New Roman font. You must include citations to a sufficient number of appropriate sources to fully support your assertions and conclusions (which will likely require more than the minimum number of citations); the paper must contain citations to a minimum of 6 sources not including the course textbook, assigned readings, and the Bible.
Organizational Leadership
Effective and practical leadership is a critical resource for any organization. Effective organizational leadership can exploit other resources such as monetary, human, technology and policies for the betterment of the organization. The right utilization of these resources allows the organization to deliver to its mandate and consequently make a sustainable profit that keeps motivating continuity of operations and expansion of operations. That suggests that different styles of leadership may apply differently to a situation. For that reason, one must engage in objective research to understand the best model of leadership for the problem at hand. In this case, leadership based on the biblical idea of covenant and biblical principles is the best model.
It is useful in facilitating interpersonal, organizational leadership and best communication practices in an organization.
Biblical View of Leadership
The biblical view of the society is that an intelligent creator who is all-knowing has a perfect love balancing justice and love, communicates to and listen to worldly being (Fischer, 2010). Through the bible, great lessons about leadership are learned.
For instance, “1 Timothy 3:1-13 ESV, the saying is trustworthy: If anyone aspires to the office of overseer, he desires a noble task. Therefore, an overseer must be above reproach, the husband of one wife, sober-minded, self-controlled, respectable, hospitable, able to teach, not a drunkard, not violent but gentle, not quarrelsome, not a lover of money. He must manage his own household well, with all dignity keeping his children submissive, for if someone does not know how to manage his own household, how will he care for God’s church? …”
The above suggests that biblical views of the society are that that is driven by values and an understanding that God through Christ understands the pain and suffering that human beings go through since Jesus was born of a human and underwent all the hardship people go through. That suggests that God can fully relate to human struggles and pains and is intimately acquainted with how people struggle. That world view can be adopted to influence leadership behavior because Christ, who is the central point of reference for Christians, is truthful, loving, just. He has values and is accustomed to the challenges that people go through. Hebrews 13:7 discuses, “Remember your leaders, those who spoke to you the word of God. Consider the outcome of their way of life and imitate their faith” (ESV). The leaders can emulate the attributes in their roles as leaders of the organization. Critically leaders should foster honesty, love, justice, influence on others, assertiveness, knowledge of issues and values. In this case, a Christian leader’s values, as portrayed by Christ, are empathy, humility, resilience, vision, positivity, integrity, and accountability. All these attributes are critical in determining interpersonal leadership.
To fully leverage on the biblical principle’s leadership can combine Christ’s above attributes into forming a covenant that morally informs agreement among leaders and followers in establishing long-term mutual relationships. A covenantal approach to operation provides love to fulfill obligations by going the extra mile to satisfy each other’s needs as guided by the commitments. That suggests that we should view each other as not being contractual but interlinked by truth, love, justice and values of empathy, humility, resilience, vision, positivity, integrity, and accountability. The next section shall look at interpersonal leadership and organizational leadership.
Interpersonal Leadership and Organizational Leadership
Interpersonal leadership is a leadership model based on inspiring followers into becoming their absolute best so that they can together realize aa shared dream (Ritz et al., 2014). Interpersonal leaders provide a structured framework to guide how others think into problems. The staff members are given the confidence to motivate and strengthen the aspirations that are already burning inside. At the same time, organizational leadership is the model focused on managing how to satisfy the needs of an individual best and maintain corporate interests. In the contemporary world, interpersonal leadership is essential in fostering productive organizational leadership.
Links Between Interpersonal Leadership and Organizational Leadership
From a biblical perspective, organizations that face hostility do not only survive but also have a chance of thriving. That can be seen through Paul’s work as he engaged the church at Ephesus and despite the resistance, he was finally able to establish a system that pioneered the transformation of the city. Therefore, organizational leaders can adopt a similar approach and succeed. In an organizational context, interpersonal leadership involves a leader understanding, caring and considerate of what others feel, communicating with competency. Additionally, it consists of nurturing good relations, conflict management, empowerment, and delegation, nurturing happiness, promoting uniform decision-making, facilitating others’ development, motivating followers, encouraging positive and innovative thinking, and any other support (Lamm et al., 2016).
Competency attributes– competency levels are a crucial feature of interpersonal leadership that affects organizational leadership (Shek et al., 2015). This means a leader must be a model for their followers to emulate. For instance, that is by posing a tendency to follow ethical, morals and accepted values of operations. From that, leaders act as change agents that guide people to take specific action in an organization’s roles. Furthermore, since leaders serve as a reference for their followers, they need to be intelligent and professionally competent to deliver to the roles confidently and successfully they aim to enforce on others (Lloyd-Walker & Walker, 2011). That suggests that with effective interpersonal leadership in an organization, the organization is led in the right direction.
Communicating competently– communication is the keystone of interpersonal leadership. A leader must ensure that they practice various communication strategies that encompass verbal and nonverbal communication (Shek et al., 2015). In perspective, by communication, an organizational leader must adopt effective communication for disseminating information upward and downward along the corporate chains of commands. Competent communicators seek information by listening, acquiring, and sending content to the right people.
Supporting others- interpersonal leadership is critical in helping other people to achieve mutual success. The leader considers other people’s feelings and seeks to keep them in achieving their roles (Wheelan et al., 2020). The support may be technical, professional, or emotional. In organizations, leaders who adopt the interpersonal approach are more accountable for their followers’ deliverables and portray a higher level of accountability. However, for this case, the leader is not the scapegoat for inconsiderate followers and as the followers, take responsibility for their actions. Such an aspect of interpersonal relationships fosters organizational development and growth.
Nurturing good relations– Leaders foster and maintain teamwork cooperation between themselves and followers and between followers and colleagues. For organizations, leaders maintain links by actively promoting interpersonal ties and making it their priority to preserve acceptable practices (McKibben, 2017). interpersonal leadership fosters good relations with followers by socializing with them and drawing all individuals into the process. That ultimately fosters a sense of fidelity among the staff members, which becomes beneficial to the organization’s mission as the staff perceives the obligation to work innovatively toward the organization’s success and are motivated to do so by leaders.
Conflicts management– is also critical since it is a fact that when people interact in an organization, they are likely to irritate their colleagues, thus leading to conflict and conflicts. Conflicts are detrimental to organizations’ success that rely on interpersonal relations as members move into delivering a common goal (Khosravi, 2020). Leaders within organizations foster organizational growth by fast-tracking conflict resolution by being arbitrators or removing the factors that may lead to a recurrence of conflicts.
Empowerment and delegation- Leaders must empower their followers into delivering to their positions without necessarily requiring to be supported. Empowerment comes from job training and technical guidance, where skilled leaders provide procedural guides for the staff members to follow in delivering certain things (Wong & Giessner, 2018). Leaders can still delegate some roles to some specific followers who portrays reliable competence levels. Delegation of responsibility implies that responsibility to deliver a task is given to the follower, thus broadening the follower’s operation and co-learning and surety of the organization’s long-term success.
Promoting uniform decision making– influential leaders engage followers in decision making through consultations, collaboration ad participation (Khosravi, 2020). That encourages the effectiveness of the on operations since all the instructions are based on standard and agreeable perspective and thus, others can willingly provide support.
Other factors of interpersonal leadership are critical in organizational leadership include: Fostering happiness, motivating others, encouraging innovative thinking, rewarding, and recognizing others.
Statesmanship and Organizational Leadership
Statesmanship is used to describe the quality of leadership and eldership that brings people together through the spirit of caring for them and fostering achievement at any practical perspective (Breedlove Jr, 2016). The statesmanship model adopted for this paper is that of biblical convents. The biblical view of statesmanship is that of a person of above reproach. They are unarrogant, are not quickly drawn to drunkards or greed, but instead hospitable, loving, self-controlled, holly and disciplined. That is discussed in 1 Timothy 3:2 ESV. “Therefore, an overseer must be above reproach, the husband of one wife, sober-minded, self-controlled, respectable, hospitable, able to teach.”
Statesmanship is critical as an intrinsic motivation that supports organizational leadership approaches through interpersonal leadership (Anderson, 2018). When leadership lacks statesmanship, an organization may not be progress in public administration as the people will lack the critical guide. Statesmanship supports the fact that there is a need within public administration to promote organizational leadership, interpersonal and organizational communication. The three considerations are necessary for building concrete trust between leaders, employees, and other stakeholders.
Organizational leadership encompasses goals settings for groups or individuals within groups. Proverbs 15:22 states, “Goal setting are discussed Without consultation, plans are frustrated, but with many counselors, they succeed.” Corporate leaders need to be visionary and organized for them to deliver to their critical roles. Tench (2017) states that leaders can perceive and understand the daily task and how they fit the organization’s strategic plans and work hand-in-hand with followers to motivate decision making, self-awareness, communication and motivation for others within dynamic contexts of the organization.
For transformational leadership, responsibilities are exercised throughout the organization by enabling the flow of guidance on roles (Taştan & Davoudi, 2019). From reading in class about transactional and transformational leadership, it is understandable that transformational leadership effectively fosters success. Transformational leadership fosters interpersonal trust. That consequently motivates employees to increase the performance of respective organizations. Therefore, organizational leadership must enforce transformational leadership on all management levels for their executives, managers, and supervisors and should be based on ideal influence, inspiration, intellectual capacitation, and consideration of respective individuals.
Interpersonal and Organizational Leadership in Promoting Best Communication Practices
When leadership is guided by stable statesmanship, which is based on biblical covenants, communication practices are enhanced despite challenges that may arise in terms of policies, finances or even change in technology. Statesman leaders are servant leaders and are entirely concerned with their followers as well as their peers. For such reason, they engage the general practice of maintaining positive engagement with staff members. That is further emulated by others who perceive freedom and flexibility in their interaction. They can then provide feedback for queries and seek clarification rather than bearing the burden of thought, which may be stressing.
Through interpersonal leadership, communication models are designed to facilitate multidimensional communication in all management levels or between the classes. Leaders foster good moral views which make the followers to direct themselves into incorporating everyone into decision making. Influential leaders practice emotional intelligence, which promotes an understanding of people’s strengths and insufficiencies. Such understanding allows leaders to focus on things that can effectively mitigate the delimitations and capitalize on strengths. That is critical, as everyone is placed in a manner that they can serve at their best. Consequently, individuals become more confident to communicate positive cultures and skills from one individual to another. Responsible leaders are those leaders that are transparent and always tell the truth. “Know this, my beloved brothers: let every person be quick to hear, slow to speak, slow to anger; (James 1:19, ESV).” That suggests that even though leaders may face difficult topics such as reorganizations or disappointing outcomes, they must be guided by values of truth and transparency to respond to the people, as necessary. They become thorough with their followers so that they can as well give their suggestions or genuine reaction to the situation.
Leaders who are aware of their organization’s needs and culture through socialization can formulate strategies to communicate change vividly. That prepares the followers for uncertainties or the difference in their responsibility. That is really just a critical point to state upon organizational growth.
Conclusion
As challenges keep mounting worldwide due to politics, failing economies and corruption among public administration, guidelines and principles come handy into providing solutions. Biblical principles have been critical in guiding leadership around the world and organizations. The principles may be vital in forming critical statesmanship, which is driven by the need to serve the followers and parent organizations’ needs. Statesmanship is achieved through effective interpersonal leadership, which guides leaders within specific organizations. Effective leadership consequently fosters better communication of skills, rules, guidance, clarifications, feedback, and queries, which are necessary for organizations’ sustainability.
Reference
Anderson, B. (2018). On Statesmanship: Developing a Model of Statesmanship (Doctoral dissertation, University of South Dakota).
Asencio, H., & Mujkic, E. (2016). Leadership behaviors and trust in leaders: Evidence from the US federal government. Public Administration Quarterly, 156-179.
Breedlove Jr, J. D. (2016). The Essential Nature of Humility for Today’s Leaders. Journal of Applied Christian Leadership, 10(1), 34-44.
Fischer, Dr. K. (2010). [Review of A Biblical-Covenantal Perspective on Organizational Behavior & Leadership]. Pearson Custom Publishing.
Khosravi, P., Rezvani, A., & Ashkanasy, N. M. (2020). Emotional intelligence: A preventive strategy to manage destructive influence of conflict in large scale projects. International Journal of Project Management, 38(1), 36-46.
Lamm, K. W., Carter, H. S., & Lamm, A. J. (2016). A theory-based model of interpersonal leadership: An integration of the literature. Journal of Leadership Education, 15(4), 183-205.
Lloyd-Walker, B., & Walker, D. (2011). Authentic leadership for 21st century project delivery. International Journal of Project Management, 29(4), 383–395. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2011.02.004
McKibben, W. B., Umstead, L. K., & Borders, L. D. (2017). Identifying dynamics of counseling leadership: A content analysis study. Journal of Counseling & Development, 95(2), 192-202.
Ritz, A., Giauque, D., Varone, F., & Anderfuhren-Biget, S. (2014). From Leadership to Citizenship Behavior in Public Organizations. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 34(2), 128–152. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734371×14521456
Shek, D. T. L., Yu, L., & Siu, A. M. H. (2015). Interpersonal competence and service leadership. International Journal on Disability and Human Development, 14(3). https://doi.org/10.1515/ijdhd-2015-0407
Taştan, S. B., & Davoudi, S. M. M. (2019). The relationship between socially responsible leadership and organizational ethical climate: in search for the role of leader’s relational transparency. International Journal of Business Governance and Ethics, 13(3), 275-299.
Tench, R., Verčič, D., Zerfass, A., Moreno, Á., & Verhoeven, P. (2017). Communication excellence: How to develop, manage and lead exceptional communications. Springer.
Wheelan, S. A., Åkerlund, M., & Jacobsson, C. (2020). Creating effective teams: A guide for members and leaders. SAGE Publications, Incorporated.
Wong, S. I., & Giessner, S. R. (2018). The thin line between empowering and laissez-faire leadership: An expectancy-match perspective. Journal of Management, 44(2), 757-783.