PSY570 SNHU Journal – Soft Language Instructions Assignment should be 280-300 words! View the clip ( https://amara.org/en/videos/3N7Tce7YFWYw/url/2701

PSY570 SNHU Journal – Soft Language Instructions

Assignment should be 280-300 words!

View the clip ( https://amara.org/en/videos/3N7Tce7YFWYw/url/270190/ ) on soft language by comedian George Carlin. Comment on how language can distort reality and how language can affect ethics and ethical decision making.

Discuss how awareness of soft language can impact your communication with clients and assess the ethical implications of soft language for the client-therapist relationship.

For additional details, please refer to the Journal Guidelines and Rubric document (attached). PSY 570 Journal Guidelines and Rubric
Overview: Journal activities in this course are an opportunity to share personal examples and reflect on the course content in a safe and private environment.
Because of nature of the information posted, only the instructor can view and comment on your assignment. Journal assignments should be 300 words or less.
Each journal is graded individually.
Guidelines for Submission: Submit assignment as a Word document with double spacing, 12-point Times New Roman font, and one-inch margins.
Critical Elements
Personal
Reflection on
Ethical Content
Exemplary (100%)
Student provides a sincere and
comprehensive personal
reflection of the ethical course
content
Proficient (90%)
Student provides a sincere
individual reflection of the
ethical course content
Depth of
Knowledge
The journal demonstrates
excellent depth of knowledge
of the module content and
exhibits careful consideration
of the topic
Organization/
Style
The journal is written in a style
that is appealing and
appropriate for the intended
audience and presented in a
clearly organized manner
Writing
Almost all of the journal is free
of errors in grammar
Most of the journal
demonstrates good depth of
knowledge of the module
content and reveals that the
student has read the module
content
Most of the journal is written in
a style that is generally
appropriate for the intended
audience and is mostly clear;
organization does not interfere
with communication
A majority of the journal is free
of errors of grammar; errors
are marginal and rarely
interrupt the flow
Needs Improvement (70%)
Student provides a reaction to
the ethical course content, but
does not provide a personal
reflection of the ethical course
content
The journal shows limited
depth of knowledge, indicating
that the student may have
reviewed the module content
but needs to explore further
Not Evident (0%)
No content of the journal is
supported with a personal
reflection of the ethical course
content
The journal does not address
the journal prompts and
reflects that the student has
not read the module content
25
The journal is written in a style
that considers the audience,
but is difficult to understand in
parts
The journal is written in a style
that does not attempt to
consider the audience, and the
content is not clearly
communicated/is difficult to
understand
The journal contains errors of
grammar that make the journal
difficult to understand
25
The journal contains some
errors of grammar, but these
are limited enough so that
assignments can be mostly
understood
Earned Total
Value
25
25
100%

Purchase answer to see full
attachment