NYU Week 6 Definition of Built Environment Reveals It Is Human Made Discussion IMPORTANT NOTE REGARDING WORD LIMIT REQUIREMENTS: Please note that each and

NYU Week 6 Definition of Built Environment Reveals It Is Human Made Discussion IMPORTANT NOTE REGARDING WORD LIMIT REQUIREMENTS:

Please note that each and every assignment has its own word limit.

The built environment touches all aspects of our lives, encompassing the buildings we live in, the distribution systems that provide us with water and electricity, and the roads, bridges, and transportation systems we use to get from place to place. It can generally be described as the man-made or modified structures that provide people with living, working and recreational spaces. Creating all these spaces and systems requires enormous quantities of materials (epa.gov, 2020). The built environment includes all of the physical parts of where we live and work (e.g., homes, buildings, streets, open spaces, and infrastructure). The built environment influences a person’s level of physical activity. For example, inaccessible or nonexistent sidewalks and bicycle or walking paths contribute to sedentary habits. These habits lead to poor health outcomes such as obesity, cardiovascular disease, diabetes, and some types of cancer. (cdc.gov, n.d.)

A community’s comprehensive plan provides an overall strategic vision for land use and development. The principles and policies included in a comprehensive plan should reflect the priorities of the community and be equitable, implementable, and promote sustainability. Detailed plans include elements related to population demographics, economic development, natural and cultural resources, community infrastructure such as transportation, emergency services and facilities, housing and land use, these plans can play a significant role in determining the future of a community’s built, social and natural environment. In this way, comprehensive plans may affect the health of populations who live in the communities governed by the project. For example, detailed plans can support or undermine opportunities for healthy living by prioritizing opportunities for exercise, healthy eating, and the development of businesses that support a healthier lifestyle (Horney et al, 2020).

Abundant evidence of social injustice, especially environmental injustice, in the distribution of ecological infrastructures has been proposed regardless of the measurement device. Numerous studies illustrate that low-income groups have less access to green spaces and recreational programs than do most people, particularly the affluent. Many studies of the socio-economic influences on green spaces have discussed the different accessibility levels of urban green areas to various populations. Some studies have argued that low-income communities in urban cores or poor suburbs suffer from a ‘‘park-poverty’’ issue. In contrast, others have noted census reports indicating that low-income populations have ample recreation facilities and unequal access to urban green spaces. The primary goals of urban planners are to promote accessibility and eliminate social-spatial inequities of access. Planners are responsible for achieving goals by fostering urban public service allocation during the planning process. However, goodwill policies such as ‘‘opening up gated residential communities’’ sometimes fall short of expectations or even produce adverse results, given the insufficient knowledge of socio-spatial differentiation. The analysis will enable an assessment of the status quo of urban green space accessibility and provide a possible path for evaluating the validity of current open-community policies (Wu et al, 2018).

Reference

Cdc.gov. (n.d.). Retrieved from https://www.cdc.gov/nceh/publications/factsheets/I…

Epa.gov. (2020). Retrieved from https://www.epa.gov/smm/basic-information-about-bu…

Horney, J. A., Dwyer, C., Vendrell-Velez, B., & Newman, G. (2020). Validating a comprehensive plan scoring system for healthy community design in League City, Texas. Journal of Urban Design, 25(2), 203–217. https://doi-org.lopes.idm.oclc.org/10.1080/1357480…

Respond to the bold paragraph ABOVE by using one of the option below… in APA format with At least two references and a minimum of 200 words….. .(The List of References should not be older than 2016 and should not be included in the word count.)

Ask a probing question.
Share an insight from having read your colleague’s posting.
Offer and support an opinion.

Validate an idea with your own experience.
Make a suggestion.
Expand on your colleague’s posting.

Be sure to support your postings and responses with specific references to the Learning Resources.

It is important that you cover all the topics identified in the assignment. Covering the topic does not mean mentioning the topic BUT presenting an explanation from the context of ethics and the readings for this class

To get maximum points you need to follow the requirements listed for this assignments 1) look at the word/page limits 2) review and follow APA rules 3) create subheadings to identify the key sections you are presenting and 4) Free from typographical and sentence construction errors.

REMEMBER IN APA FORMAT JOURNAL TITLES AND VOLUME NUMBERS ARE ITALICIZED.