Nyu Ground Water Pollution in The Rural Area Discussion IMPORTANT NOTE REGARDING WORD LIMIT REQUIREMENTS: Please note that each and every assignment has i

Nyu Ground Water Pollution in The Rural Area Discussion IMPORTANT NOTE REGARDING WORD LIMIT REQUIREMENTS:

Please note that each and every assignment has its own word limit.

Research a vulnerable population (inner city, rural area, or developing nation). In a 1,250-1,500 word paper, evaluate the environmental health issues facing the chosen population, and propose strategies to promote health through environmental stewardship. Include the following:

Describe the vulnerable population you chose, and explain why this group faces health inequity.
Describe the environmental health issue affecting this population: What caused the issue or what was the environmental exposure linked to the environmental health issue negatively influencing the public health of this population? Discuss the correlating public health issues. Identify one or more surveillance report, provide morbidity and mortality rates, and explain the burden of disease from the environmental exposure.
Evaluate current policy as it relates to the promotion of public health, health equity, and environmental stewardship. What changes need to be made, or what policies need to be implemented, to improve public health and health equity through environmental stewardship. Discuss the policymaking process, including shared decision-making that must occur to create functional policy. Include the roles of ethical evidence-based decision making in this process. Consider Health in All Policies as you complete the evaluation and make recommendations.
Discuss what is currently being done to address the environmental health issue, as well as public health. Evaluate the effectiveness of these efforts. Consider aid given, models implemented, and private-public partnerships promoting health and environmental stewardship.
Introduce a community design to further address the environmental health issue and improve public health through long-term environmental stewardship. Include renewable and sustainable resources.
Identify stakeholders necessary for implementation of the proposed strategies/community design. Include community members, local and federal government, global organizations, organizations offering aid, and faith-based and other nonprofit organizations, etc.

General Requirements

You are required to cite at least SIX sources to complete this assignment. Sources must be published within the last 5 years and appropriate for the discussion question criteria and public health content.

Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide. An abstract is not required.

While APA style is required, solid academic writing is expected as well, and documentation of sources should be presented using APA formatting guidelines.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

PLEASE make sure APA citation and permalink for articles are complete and correct.

PLEASE add the links/sites below to the reference list if you use any of these readings and make sure everything is in proper APA format.

https://apastyle.apa.org/learn/quick-guide-on-refe…

Review Chapter 2 in Understanding Environmental Health: How We Live in the World.

URL:

http://www.gcumedia.com/digital-resources/jones-and-bartlett/2013/understanding-environmental-health_how-we-live-in-the-world_ebook_2e.php

Read “Environment, Ethics, and Human Health,” by Resnik and Portier, located on the Hastings Center website.

URL:

Read “The Developing Role of Evidence-Based Environmental Health,” by Dhesi and Stewart, from SAGE Open (2015).

URL:

http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/2158244015611711

Read “Ethics in Environmental Health,” by Adler, from Environmental Health Perspectives (2004).

URL:

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1253676/

Read “Health in All Polices: A Guide for State and Local Governments,” by the Public Health Institute, the California Department of Public Health, and the American Public Health Association (2013), located on the Public Health Institute website.

URL:

http://www.phi.org/uploads/files/Four_Pager_Health_in_All_Policies-A_Guide_for_State_and_Local_Governments.pdf

Review the Public Health, Environmental and Social Determinants of Health (PHE) page of the World Health Organization (WHO) website.

URL:

http://www.who.int/phe/health_topics/en/

Explore the Environmental Policies News page of the Science Daily website.

URL:

https://www.sciencedaily.com/news/science_society/environmental_policy/

Explore the Resources page of the Public Health Institute website.

URL:

http://www.phi.org/resources/?resource=hiapguide&gclid=Cj0KEQjw1ufKBRDYrqLzrY3dy88BEiQAPI_r4bDYIl-2VYK4-gf-XyVZGR3Qa2Na248jGGtYNOlYEJcaAlDx8P8HAQ

Explore resources available on the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) website.

URL:

https://www.osha.gov/

MUST haveat least 5 citations with the page numbers and 5 references in APA format.(The List of References should not be older than 2016 and should not be included in the word count.)

Be sure to support your postings and responses with specific references to the Learning Resources.

It is important that you cover all the topics identified in the assignment. Covering the topic does not mean mentioning the topic BUT presenting an explanation from the context of ethics and the readings for this class

I am a stickler for good organization in everything. I do not want to have to dig for your answers. For instance, if an assignment asks you to provide three examples of something, I suggest that you number them 1-3 so I can find them easily. I also expect that when you submit something as a narrative, you pay attention to how you organize your thoughts: use paragraphs with a topic sentence and supporting sentences; and change paragraphs whenever you introduce a new idea. Also, if there are multiple parts to an assignment, use sub-heads within the paper to organize them.

To get maximum points you need to follow the requirements listed for this assignments 1) look at the word/page limits 2) review and follow APA rules 3) create subheadings to identify the key sections you are presenting and 4) Free from typographical and sentence construction errors.

REMEMBER IN APA FORMAT JOURNAL TITLES AND VOLUME NUMBERS ARE ITALICIZED. Course Code
PUB-560
Class Code
PUB-560-O500
Criteria
Content
Percentage
70.0%
Vulnerable Population and Health Inequity
10.0%
Environmental Health Issue Affecting Population 10.0%
Evaluation of Current Policy (Public health,
health equity, environmental stewardship,
Health in All Policies)
15.0%
Current Efforts Addressing the Environmental
Health Issue and Public Health
15.0%
Community Design
15.0%
Stakeholders Needed for the Implementation of
the Community Design
5.0%
Organization and Effectiveness
20.0%
Thesis Development and Purpose
7.0%
Argument Logic and Construction
8.0%
Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling,
punctuation, grammar, language use)
5.0%
Format
10.0%
Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the
major and assignment)
5.0%
Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes,
references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to
assignment and style)
5.0%
Total Weightage
100%
Assignment Title
Stewardship in Environmental Health
Unsatisfactory (0.00%)
A vulnerable population is not chosen.
An environmental health issue affecting this population is not
discussed.
Evaluation of current policy as it relates to the promotion of
public health, health equity, and environmental stewardship
is not presented. Health in All Policies is not included.
Current efforts addressing the environmental health issue
and public health are not discussed.
A community design is not presented.
Stakeholders necessary for the implementation of the
proposed strategies/community design are not presented.
Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing
claim.
Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The
conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is
incoherent and uses noncredible sources.
Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede
communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or
sentence construction is used.
Template is not used appropriately or documentation format
is rarely followed correctly.
Sources are not documented.
Total Points
200.0
Less than Satisfactory (74.00%)
A vulnerable population is chosen. An incomplete summary
of why the population faces health inequity is presented.
An incomplete summary of the environmental health issue
affecting this population is presented, but a surveillance
report is not used.
An incomplete evaluation of current policy as it relates to the
promotion of public health, health equity, and environmental
stewardship is presented. The evaluation contains
inaccuracies. Health in All Policies is referenced.
An incomplete summary of current efforts addressing the
environmental health issue and public health is presented.
The summary contains inaccuracies.
An incomplete community design does not fully address the
environmental health issue or provide steps to improve
public health through long-term environmental stewardship.
A few stakeholders necessary for the implementation of the
proposed strategies/community design are referenced. The
purpose and role of the stakeholders is unclear. The
stakeholders represented do not represent a diverse group as
outlined in the assignment criteria.
Thesis is insufficiently developed or vague. Purpose is not
clear.
Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks
consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some
sources have questionable credibility.
Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the
reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word
choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not
varied.
Appropriate template is used, but some elements are missing
or mistaken. A lack of control with formatting is apparent.
Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as
appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous
formatting errors.
Satisfactory (79.00%)
A vulnerable population is described. A general explanation of
why the population faces health inequity is presented. More
support or evidence is needed. There are some inaccuracies.
A general description of the environmental health issue
affecting this population is presented. The reason or
environmental exposure causing the issue is summarized, but
it is not the primary reason for the health issue. Correlating
public health issues are generalized. One or more surveillance
report is used, but there are some inaccuracies. More
A general evaluation of current policy as it relates to the
promotion of public health, health equity, and environmental
stewardship is presented. Some changes or policies that need
to be implemented to improve public health and health
equity through environmental stewardship are outlined. The
policymaking process and shared decision making to create
A general discussion of current efforts addressing the
environmental health issue and public health is presented. A
general evaluation of the effectiveness of these efforts is
discussed according to the assignment criteria. More
information or rationale is needed. There are some
inaccuracies.
A community design generally addresses the environmental
health issue and provides an overview of the steps required
to improve public health through long-term environmental
stewardship. More information or detail is required.
Most major stakeholders necessary for the implementation
of the proposed strategies/community design are identified.
The purpose and role for each of the stakeholders are
summarized. The stakeholders represent a diverse group as
outlined in the assignment criteria.
Thesis is apparent and appropriate to purpose.
Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The
argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument
logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources
used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the
thesis.
Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are
not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied
sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are
employed
Appropriate template is used. Formatting is correct, although
some minor errors may be present.
Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and
style, although some formatting errors may be present.
Good (87.00%)
A vulnerable population is described. An explanation of why
the population faces health inequity is presented. Some
support or evidence is needed.
A description of the environmental health issue affecting this
population is presented. The reason or environmental
exposure causing the issue is discussed. Correlating public
health issues are presented. One or more surveillance report
is used and accurately reports morbidity and mortality rates
and burden of disease. Some information or evidence is
An evaluation of current policy as it relates to the promotion
of public health, health equity, and environmental
stewardship is discussed. Key changes or policies that need to
be implemented to improve public health and health equity
through environmental stewardship are discussed. The
policymaking process and shared decision making to create
A discussion of current efforts addressing the environmental
health issue and public health is presented. An evaluation of
the effectiveness of these efforts is discussed according to
the assignment criteria. More information or rationale is
needed. There are some inaccuracies.
A community design addresses the environmental health
issue and provides an overview of the steps required to
improve public health through long-term environmental
stewardship. Some information or minor changes are needed.
The major stakeholders necessary for the implementation of
the proposed strategies/community design are identified. The
purpose and role for each of the stakeholders are described.
The stakeholders represent a diverse group as outlined in the
assignment criteria.
Thesis is clear and forecasts the development of the paper.
Thesis is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and
appropriate to the purpose.
Argument shows logical progressions. Techniques of
argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of
claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are
authoritative.
Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may
be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence
structures and figures of speech.
Appropriate template is fully used. There are virtually no
errors in formatting style.
Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and
style, and format is mostly correct.
Excellent (100.00%)
A vulnerable population is described. An explanation of why
the population faces health inequity is presented. Strong
support and rationale are provided to support explanation.
A detailed description of the environmental health issue
affecting this population is presented. The reason or
environmental exposure causing the issue is accurate and
thoroughly discussed. Correlating public health issues are
presented. One or more surveillance report is used and
accurately reports morbidity and mortality rates and burden
A thorough evaluation of current policy as it relates to the
promotion of public health, health equity, and environmental
stewardship is discussed. Important changes or policies that
need to be implemented to improve public health and health
equity through environmental stewardship are clearly
identified and discussed. The policymaking process and
A detailed discussion of current efforts addressing the
environmental health issue and public health is presented. A
thorough evaluation of the effectiveness of these efforts is
discussed according to the assignment criteria. Compelling
evidence and rationale are provided.
A well-organized community design specifically addresses the
environmental health issue and provides detailed steps to
improve public health through long-term environmental
stewardship. The overall design is effective and realistic.
All stakeholders necessary for the implementation of the
proposed strategies/community design are clearly identified.
The purpose and role for each of the stakeholders are
thoroughly described. The stakeholders represent a diverse
group as outlined in the assignment criteria.
Comments
Thesis is comprehensive and contains the essence of the
paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper
clear.
Clear and convincing argument that presents a persuasive
claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are
authoritative.
Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic
English.
All format elements are correct.
Sources are completely and correctly documented, as
appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of
error.
Points Earned

Purchase answer to see full
attachment