FYS 112 University of Evansville Toward Compassionate Society Article Discussion Write a summary and analysis essay with the following paragraphs: Introduc

FYS 112 University of Evansville Toward Compassionate Society Article Discussion Write a summary and analysis essay with the following paragraphs: Introduction which should both introduce and contain your THESIS:Mahbub ul Haq’s article “Toward A Compassionate Society” is/is not worth reading ….(the “because” part [your essay map] will be developed from your three analysis paragraphs)Summary of ul Haq’s article in your own words and sentence structure (keep your opinion of the book out of the summary: summarize only ul Haq’s ideas, in the order in which he presents them) – Don’t forget to begin the summary with a signal phrase. Don’t forget to include his six steps. The summary should be no more than two-thirds of a page. First analysis paragraph (a regular TRIAC body paragraph)Transition + Second analysis paragraph (a regular TRIAC body paragraph)Transition + Third analysis paragraph (a regular TRIAC body paragraph)Transition + Conclusion (short!)Works Cited Page correctly formatted in current MLA format. FYS 112 02, 03, and 04 – Toward a Compassionate Society – Spring 2020 – Summary-and-Analysis Essay
(Paper 3) – 15% of grade – at least 3 full pages. MLA format, please. I will not grade a paper that does not use
signal phrases and in-text parenthetical citations responsibly. This essay should be freshly written, for this class
only. Use short quotations only (that is, shorter than 4 of your lines).
Step 1: a) CAREFULLY read Mahbub ul Haq’s “Toward a Compassionate Society” (the link is in the Content
section of bblearn). Be an active reader and thinker.
b) Watch the presentation recorded on panopto (green icon), in the Content section of bblearn.
Yes, there’s an error in the panopto presentation: ul Haq did not propose family planning services to all
malnourished children; he DID propose family planning service for all willing couples.
Step 2: Write a summary and analysis essay with the following paragraphs:
I.
Introduction which should both introduce and contain your THESIS: Mahbub ul Haq’s article
“Toward A Compassionate Society” is/is not worth reading …. (the “because” part [your essay
map] will be developed from your three analysis paragraphs)
II.
Summary of ul Haq’s article in your own words and sentence structure (keep your opinion of the
book out of the summary: summarize only ul Haq’s ideas, in the order in which he presents
them) – Don’t forget to begin the summary with a signal phrase. Don’t forget to include his six
steps. The summary should be no more than two-thirds of a page.
III.
First analysis paragraph (a regular TRIAC body paragraph)
IV.
Transition + Second analysis paragraph (a regular TRIAC body paragraph)
V.
Transition + Third analysis paragraph (a regular TRIAC body paragraph)
VI.
Transition + Conclusion (short!)
VII.
Works Cited Page correctly formatted in current MLA format.
By what criteria will you analyze the book?
Everyone will analyze the book by the following criterion:
1) Does ul Haq distinguish between actions that are compassionate from actions that are not
compassionate?
In addition, select TWO criteria from the following:
2) Does ul Haq use appropriate and relevant content to develop ideas?
3) Does he use language that communicates meaning to the reader?
4) Does he articulate issues/problems to be considered critically in a manner that defines terms, explores
ambiguities, determines boundaries and/or establishes backgrounds?
5) Does he acknowledge different sides of the issue? Question some assumptions? Identify several
relevant contexts when presenting a position?
Once you have written your body paragraphs, you can look at the topic sentences and reverse engineer the
thesis statement and essay map. You will need to revise the paper after doing so.
Remember that whether you like/dislike the article is not the determining criterion.
Peer Review on April 20 – by Discussion Board or email (up to you)
Primary Reader’s letter is due to your author and wt5 on March 27 at 11:59 p.m.
Revise, revise, revise. Edit, too.
Final version due on paper on April 24 to turnitin.com. If bblearn’s link to turnitin.com will not work for
you, please email the paper to Prof. Thomas at wt5@evansville.edu.
Why are we doing this? To develop a thesis on the basis of the careful reading of a text. To clearly articulate the
reasons for your opinion. To enjoy hearing others’ opinions during the peer review.
Questions? Ask Professor Thomas at any stage of the writing process: drafts, bits and pieces, ideas. The
Writing Center is also a valuable resource, as is the peer copyediting service.
WRITING PROGRAM RUBRIC – revised 2015 by W. Thomas and I. McDonald
GRADE
EARNED
A
B
C
D
F
IDEAS/CONTENT
The essay shows very
original, intelligent,
and perceptive
thought, and all ideas
are fully developed
and very well
supported.
ORGANIZATION
The essay shows a clear,
appropriate structure and
evidence of thoughtful,
original planning, and the
sequence of ideas is easy
to follow. The essay also
uses good transitions
consistently and has no
significant lapses in
overall structure. The
essay is also cohesive on
a sentence level.
The essay shows
The essay shows a clear
some original thought structure and evidence of
and authentic
thoughtful planning, and
engagement, and
the sequence of ideas is
some ideas are
easy to follow. The essay
developed and well
also uses some good
supported.
transitions.
The essay shows
The essay shows a clear
some thought and
but ordinary structure,
engagement, but the
and the sequence of ideas
ideas are not
is easy to follow because
developed and well
the essay uses some
supported or seem
transitions.
cliché or unoriginal.
The essay shows
The essay shows some
some thought on the
structure, and/or the
topic and/or minimal sequence of ideas is
engagement with the sometimes difficult to
topic or sources.
follow.
The essay shows
The essay is poorly
little-to-no thought
constructed, and/or the
on the topic or does
reader often cannot
not address the topic. follow the sequence of
ideas.
LANGUAGE
The essay has few minor,
basic errors, and the
diction and phrasing are
clear, vigorous, and
fresh.
The essay has no major,
distracting basic errors,
and the diction and
phrasing are clear but not
vigorous or fresh.
The essay has few
distracting basic errors,
and the diction and
phrasing are clear but not
vigorous or fresh.
The essay has enough
basic errors to distract the
reader, and/or the diction
and phrasing are
sometimes ambiguous.
The essay has numerous
basic errors (grammar,
punctuation, mechanics,
and spelling), and/or the
diction and phrasing are
hard to decipher.

Purchase answer to see full
attachment