ACT253 DePaul University I-SITE Immersive Experience Hall of Fame Nomination Hi there!I need the written part of this assignment done. I have already done

ACT253 DePaul University I-SITE Immersive Experience Hall of Fame Nomination Hi there!I need the written part of this assignment done. I have already done the oral presentation. I did the presentation on Horse racing at the Kentucky Derby at Churchill Downs in Louisville, Kentucky. The file attached explains what the paper needs to include. Thank you! TO: I-SITE Research Fellows – 2019 Cohort
FROM:
Dean Corrin
I-SITE Founder and Executive Director
Assignment: I-SITE Immersive Experience Hall of Fame Nomination
Due Monday, May 20
Esteemed Fellows,
Each year the Institute honors an important achievement in immersive entertainment by
inducting an outstanding attraction into the I-SITE Hall of Fame. An important
responsibility of the I-SITE research fellows is the selection of this year’s honoree.
Your task: Each Research Fellow will nominate an immersive event or attraction for
this award. The nomination consists of a written nomination and an persuasive oral
presentation to the other Fellows. Fellows will select the winner through a series of votes
between nominees. (This discussion will also help us to change or refine the criteria.)
Eligibility Requirements:
1. To assure that the winner has a lasting impact, nominees must normally have
opened 10 years before they are eligible. (In cases of extreme merit or
significance to the field, special citations may be awarded to more recent
nominees.)
2. Nominees may come from any field of immersive entertainment including, but
not limited to, theme parks, historical sites, museums, exhibits, and theatrical
presentations.
3. Nominees should represent the finest work in the field and demonstrate a
significant impact or influence.
4. Nominees created before 1955 are also eligible for the Legacy Award for
foundation achievements in the form.
The Nomination Form
Required components of the Nomination Form:
1. Information for the Hall of Fame Plaque. (1 page)
a. A one-sentence tagline or description of the attraction.
b. The inscription on the plaque explaining the importance of the
attraction and why it is included in the Hall of Fame (No more than
250 words)
2. The text for the Hall of Fame catalogue (2 pages)
a. Title and location of attraction.
b. Date of origin
c. Name or names of primary creators.
d. Text describing the attraction and making the case for the inclusion of
the attraction. Things to consider (but not limited to):
i. Historical importance in the field
ii. How it meets criteria for immersive theatre
iii. Artistic or technical innovations
iv. Connection to aesthetic, social or political concerns of its time
v. How has it endured over time (how the audience receptions has
changed or remained constant over time or among different
audiences)
Oral Presentation – no more than 5 minutes
Present a persuasive argument for the selection of your nominee, summarizing the case
made in your nomination form.
Be prepared to answer questions about your nominee (as well as asking questions about
other nominees).
If your attraction is selected to move ahead in the completion by the class, you will have
the opportunity to add to your argument and respond to questions from the class.
Thank you for your contribution to this important work of the Institute!
CRITERIA FOR GRADING:
100 points possible
APPLICATION OF CRITERIA
20
The nomination thoughtfully addresses the ways in which the attraction addresses
a specific and defined set of criteria.
17
The nomination includes consideration of the criteria.
14
The nomination makes some connection to the criteria.
11
The fails to address the developing criteria.
HISTORICAL CONTEXT
10
The nomination places the attraction in a historical context, explaining how its
creation has had a significant impact on the field.
8.5
The nomination includes significant background on the attraction.
7
The nomination makes some mention of the historical place of the attraction.
5.5
The nomination does not include significant historical context on the attraction.
SOURCE MATERIAL
10
The nomination includes thoughtful perspective on how the attraction draws on
source material and adapts that material to the medium of immersive theatre.
8.5
The nomination provides useful information on the source material of the
attraction..
7
The nomination includes some background on the source material.
5.5
The nomination does not include significant information about the source
material.
CLARITY OF EXPRESSION
10
The ideas of the proposal are clearly and articulately expressed.
8.5
The ideas of the proposal are comprehensible.
7
The ideas of the proposal are somewhat unclear and require the reader to sort
them out.
5.5
The ideas of the proposal are unclear and confusing.
ORAL PRESENTATION
10
8.5
7
5.5
The presentation fully, thoughtfully, and completely addresses the components of
the written nomination.
The presentation generally addresses the components of the written nomination.
The presentation somewhat addresses the components of the written nomination.
The presentation is unclear and confusing.
CLASS DISCUSSION
10
8.5
7
5.5
The fellow thoughtfully and fully responds to questions and critique from the
class. The fellow asks thoughtful questions and makes useful comment on other
nominations.
The fellow is generally able to respond to questions and critique from the class.
The fellow actively engages in class discussion.
The fellow is somewhat able to respond to questions and critique and to take part
in class discussion.
The fellow does not effectively engage in class discussion.
FORMAT
10
8.5
7
5.5
The paper is three pages, typed, double spaced with standard margins and using
10 or 12 point font. The format is consistent throughout. The paper is neat and
inviting to the reader.
The paper falls short in one or two areas.
The paper falls short in several areas.
The author has not met the requirements.
STYLE
10
Language is used with control, elegance and imagination to serve the writer’s
purpose. The essay, when read aloud, pleases the eye and ear.
8.5
Language is used competently throughout and is never awkward. There are no
sentences that confuse the reader or interrupt the reader’s flow.
7
Language is used competently, though it may be awkward at times. There are few
sentences that confuse the reader and none that are incomprehensible.
5.5
The language is muddy and the reader is frequently at a loss to understand what
the writer is trying to say.
MECHANICS
10
Except for deliberate departures (the quoted speech of a person, a humorous
purpose, and so on), the writer uses Edited Written Standard English forms of
grammar, punctuation, spelling and syntax.
8.5
7
5.5
Except for deliberate departures (the quoted speech of a person, a humorous
purpose, and so on), the writer uses Edited Written Standard English forms of
grammar, punctuation, spelling and syntax. There is no more than an average of
one departure from ESWE per page in any combination of the following areas:
sentence boundary punctuation, spelling and typos, use of apostrophe and plural,
ESWE verb and pronoun forms, ESWE agreement between subject-verb and
pronoun-antecedent.
Except for deliberate departures (the quoted speech of a person, a humorous
purpose, and so on), the writer uses Edited Written Standard English forms of
grammar, punctuation, spelling and syntax. There are no more than an average of
two departures from ESWE per page in any combination of the following areas:
sentence boundary punctuation, spelling and typos, use of apostrophe and plural,
ESWE verb and pronoun forms, ESWE agreement between subject-verb and
pronoun-antecedent.
The use of ESWE fall below the standard established above.

Purchase answer to see full
attachment